Hello Poetry
Submit your work and get some sparkles! Create free account
"narrators" poems
(Note: the italics are the narrators thoughts) Dearest Love, Are you okay all alone? I miss you with all my heart. *No, I miss you with all the hearts in the world you are the only fish in the sea for me.* I love it here in paradise.  I just wish it wasn't for work. I hate it here with all my heart.  I dread the lack of your presence. If only you could see the sky as the sun sets. It reminds me of your eyes, and I cry everyday. I hope the distance didn't cause you to forget me and pick another lover, just kidding.  I know you wouldn't do that. You wouldn't... right... cause if you did, I'd die. Well anyways dearest love, I hope to see you soon. I'll book tickets for you now, even if it takes my life savings just to see your face. I wish you were here. Love, More than any quantity of love imaginable. Your one true love. I hope...
0
Mar 4, 2015
Mar 4, 2015 at 9:52 PM UTC
Wish You Were Here
If you fancy a cheap thrill, I suggest you buy erotica read on CD. The narrators never disappoint. Listen to it only in your car. Be sure to take the route with one too many stoplights— teeming with all of the self-righteous pedestrians who think they always warrant the right-of-way. Roll down all of your windows. Turn the volume up to a number that will allow you to suitably share. Employ a smirk of the most contented caliber, & bank on making someone’s ********* day. *('Cause, no matter how you skin it, we’re all some kind of human.)*
0
Sep 3, 2013
Sep 3, 2013 at 12:24 PM UTC
idea #117
/                    nietzsche wrote his *ecce ****                                                   book...                          now?! apparently we're all supposed to write a book, entitled mea culpa... (?) i just want an authenticity of using the index, index finger, and being able                         to point... without sacrificing the ownership of a shadow attachment...                and how does the víšégrād group     (oh i'm into linguistic sabotage,      writing such a word, treating it as a bomb,      and knowing the "nuance"? well...    the manchester mob, the panic,            and what is the concept of islam if not advocacy         for literacy? no? really?!) invite the bulgars...                         (?) like a birth of a 2nd. yugoslavia... or the shift of    the 2nd holy empire to the, "left" in copernican "terms"...     there are the narrators, the observers, the critics,    and the: chanced eyes on the mess... no... in the collectivist / corporate mind-sent?               mea culpa is not on the agenda...                            "we" have already stressed the situation past the mea culpa:               come: ecce ****                       and the crucifixion /                                           guillotine. come the bulgars...    and why am i not expressing an intellectual ben hur of an index finger? managed to punch myself 20 times in the face and give myself a plum beneath the eye?           so what's wrong with "flexing" attributing the tongue to an index finger "exasperation"?      so few books are actually ecce **** orientated...                     always the mea culpa, never, never, ever,                          tua culpa: ergo?                    ecce ****               shh... quiet...      just mention the concept of mea culpa                      to elißabeth fritzl    how much of masochistic               "moralißing" does it have to take place, trans-temporal   and justifying                  the mono-spatial realm of a "past", and, "now"                 before being crucified is no longer deemed the same as labouring with                        a hammer, or a chisel?! i say that: metaphorically frothing at the mouth. firt i learned to throw a punch onto my face... give myself a plum just beneath the eye socket: now i know the mea culpa mantra, as i know the existence of the index finger, being differentiated from the fist... and? the tua culpa mantra.
0
Jul 10, 2018
Jul 10, 2018 at 10:13 PM UTC
literary "criticism" (tua culpa)
/                    nietzsche wrote his *ecce ****                                                   book...                          now?! apparently we're all supposed to write a book, entitled mea culpa... (?) i just want an authenticity of using the index, index finger, and being able                         to point... without sacrificing the ownership of a shadow attachment...                and how does the víšégrād group     (oh i'm into linguistic sabotage,      writing such a word, treating it as a bomb,      and knowing the "nuance"? well...    the manchester mob, the panic,            and what is the concept of islam if not advocacy         for literacy? no? really?!) invite the bulgars...                         (?) like a birth of a 2nd. yugoslavia... or the shift of    the 2nd holy empire to the, "left" in copernican "terms"...     there are the narrators, the observers, the critics,    and the: chanced eyes on the mess... no... in the collectivist / corporate mind-sent?               mea culpa is not on the agenda...                            "we" have already stressed the situation past the mea culpa:               come: ecce ****                       and the crucifixion /                                           guillotine. come the bulgars...    and why am i not expressing an intellectual ben hur of an index finger? managed to punch myself 20 times in the face and give myself a plum beneath the eye?           so what's wrong with "flexing" attributing the tongue to an index finger "exasperation"?      so few books are actually ecce **** orientated...                     always the mea culpa, never, never, ever,                          tua culpa: ergo?                    ecce ****               shh... quiet...      just mention the concept of mea culpa                      to elißabeth fritzl    how much of masochistic               "moralißing" does it have to take place, trans-temporal   and justifying                  the mono-spatial realm of a "past", and, "now"                 before being crucified is no longer deemed the same as labouring with                        a hammer, or a chisel?! i say that: metaphorically frothing at the mouth. firt i learned to throw a punch onto my face... give myself a plum just beneath the eye socket: now i know the mea culpa mantra, as i know the existence of the index finger, being differentiated from the fist... and? the tua culpa mantra.
Continue reading...
94
Watching documentaries about your trendy bands. The 'Creative Process'. My shaking hands. I'm inspiration and envy and my own constant shame Because I'm still Lost to Larsson but by a new name. I find meaning in nothing and nothing is mine. I find meaning in water, in four inked red lines. I fixate and form cycles, I'm Beckett's star act. I make all these references, I muddle all that. I'm an artist, I read, these aren't my own thoughts. I'm not troubled, just open, And I'm not really lost. So what can I believe in? Hell, what can anyone? **** God. **** 'The Classics' I'll believe in being young.
0
Jul 6, 2013
Jul 6, 2013 at 9:16 PM UTC
Unreliable Narrators
LIFE I ask you as I begin, how would you describe LIFE? For me the word "Euphoria" comes to mind in a weird sense. Have we become our own narrators forbidden to live our own rehabilitated LIVES? Does LIFE for some have no meaning, where laws have incarcerated in the hearts of people who declare our own existence? We somehow fly a flag of nations, of countries what does it represent? Peace new LIFE or a pushchair war? Seems to me LIFE has become a class of its own distinction, never knowing its own ending. Is money the ultimate ruler of our hormonal LIVES? At the end do we desire what we fear the most? LAZA 09
0
Feb 2, 2010
Feb 2, 2010 at 3:23 AM UTC
LIFE
*box ***** box! no one ever said bare x-rayed knuckle rough up, but my tongue ain't just an oyster, so here's to a champagne flute ***** and an oyster shell tilted for a slurp ultra crescendo, a runaway: writing philosophy lets you explore the many narrators that are impotent creating characters, while fictive narration has many characters and a few dimensions of narrations, like the *** in the city gall said: newspapers are printed, they're not supposed to convey stories, or be the post-modern basis for a skeletal anastrophe of storytelling.* you will not get any more artists when you educate blanks to canvas a Gucci with a brothel of colours that might be tamed into the anti-artist vocabulary deciphering cubism... brothel of colours? well **** is red, **** is brush, you get an orchestra of vowels with hues, pink is for arson, the other pink is for fish against stream, they never air-guitar bass rhymes or solos, it's a shame, bass guitar is more akin to drums and therefore more memorable than brown-nosing vocals and lead guitars... well coral red became gangrene green when the snorkelling offshoot to finding the titanic wreckage took off... i said the titanic rhythms of bass guitar was more airy than the scandalous pitch notes of guitar turned soprano like a michael jackson wannabe... twist of the ***** / twist off the ***** get a screwdriver, scandinavian ha ha: am i grey bearded enough to act out a norwegian version of hamlet? no? gooooood... that's dracula saying mornin' 'n' evenin' together; i'm into revising tabloids by making many references... culturally explicit ***** crap... big **** elephant ***** wide... i'm all ****** up for it to be the defining concern of our times.
0
Feb 20, 2016
Feb 20, 2016 at 8:05 PM UTC
colours
*box ***** box! no one ever said bare x-rayed knuckle rough up, but my tongue ain't just an oyster, so here's to a champagne flute ***** and an oyster shell tilted for a slurp ultra crescendo, a runaway: writing philosophy lets you explore the many narrators that are impotent creating characters, while fictive narration has many characters and a few dimensions of narrations, like the *** in the city gall said: newspapers are printed, they're not supposed to convey stories, or be the post-modern basis for a skeletal anastrophe of storytelling.* you will not get any more artists when you educate blanks to canvas a Gucci with a brothel of colours that might be tamed into the anti-artist vocabulary deciphering cubism... brothel of colours? well **** is red, **** is brush, you get an orchestra of vowels with hues, pink is for arson, the other pink is for fish against stream, they never air-guitar bass rhymes or solos, it's a shame, bass guitar is more akin to drums and therefore more memorable than brown-nosing vocals and lead guitars... well coral red became gangrene green when the snorkelling offshoot to finding the titanic wreckage took off... i said the titanic rhythms of bass guitar was more airy than the scandalous pitch notes of guitar turned soprano like a michael jackson wannabe... twist of the ***** / twist off the ***** get a screwdriver, scandinavian ha ha: am i grey bearded enough to act out a norwegian version of hamlet? no? gooooood... that's dracula saying mornin' 'n' evenin' together; i'm into revising tabloids by making many references... culturally explicit ***** crap... big **** elephant ***** wide... i'm all ****** up for it to be the defining concern of our times.
Continue reading...
32
you know, you are allowed a Kandinsky or a ******* moment in poetry: it's like the development of the cut-up technique beginning with Tristan Tzara and the Dada "school" of "thought", developed later by William Burroughs et al., it doesn't have to be fixated to a definite curvature, a smooth narrative, this is poetry in a boat, during a storm on the sea, it's not a Cambridge v. Oxford boat race on the pristine Thames... some critics ascribe such methodology as either outright stupid or by psychiatric definition a *word salad*, but it's simply kaleidoscopic juxtaposition, it really is a dog drooling ultraviolet saliva onto a canvas, while someone shakes his head (preferably a bulldog, or a boxer, or a St. Bernard)... oh look at him, such ***** eyes, gotta just cuddle him... i'm not using newspaper snippets, as if writing a stalker's letter, cutting out letters and gluing them together on a piece of paper... it's spontaneous combustion (most of the time)... the only method in it is that there isn't a method to begin with... unless randomisation of a gaseous substance with that hectic squash game of atoms is the adequate simile... if i were to say that was a metaphorical comparison i'd be walking through foggy streets of London (circa 1884): after all words have only a one dimensional interaction that's the existential recipient of all of them, the existentially affirmative aye - i left the other affirmative word thought among the others, since, sometimes, as in the cases of melancholia, thought isn't necessarily categorised as affirmative, relegating, drowning the prime affirmative aye with its awkward structure (form)... all the words must pass through the ego, not all of them have to pass through thought, the ones that bounce against the squash cube wall that's ego make it onto the page... more do so when compared with treating thought as the wall and the effective structure for the rubber ball to bounce against. me playing squash? oh yes, very much so, loved it, played about 4 times a week, better than tennis, which is why no squash tournaments are televised, it's not really a spectator sport, it's too enjoyable to have a passive public... it's a sport with the player in mind, like a horse attached to a carriage with those shutters over their eyes; so now what? is poetry not allowed to look like a ******* painting, randomised and incoherent when compared to the standard practices of narrators?
0
May 23, 2016
May 23, 2016 at 1:08 PM UTC
Kandinsky moments in poetry
you know, you are allowed a Kandinsky or a ******* moment in poetry: it's like the development of the cut-up technique beginning with Tristan Tzara and the Dada "school" of "thought", developed later by William Burroughs et al., it doesn't have to be fixated to a definite curvature, a smooth narrative, this is poetry in a boat, during a storm on the sea, it's not a Cambridge v. Oxford boat race on the pristine Thames... some critics ascribe such methodology as either outright stupid or by psychiatric definition a *word salad*, but it's simply kaleidoscopic juxtaposition, it really is a dog drooling ultraviolet saliva onto a canvas, while someone shakes his head (preferably a bulldog, or a boxer, or a St. Bernard)... oh look at him, such ***** eyes, gotta just cuddle him... i'm not using newspaper snippets, as if writing a stalker's letter, cutting out letters and gluing them together on a piece of paper... it's spontaneous combustion (most of the time)... the only method in it is that there isn't a method to begin with... unless randomisation of a gaseous substance with that hectic squash game of atoms is the adequate simile... if i were to say that was a metaphorical comparison i'd be walking through foggy streets of London (circa 1884): after all words have only a one dimensional interaction that's the existential recipient of all of them, the existentially affirmative aye - i left the other affirmative word thought among the others, since, sometimes, as in the cases of melancholia, thought isn't necessarily categorised as affirmative, relegating, drowning the prime affirmative aye with its awkward structure (form)... all the words must pass through the ego, not all of them have to pass through thought, the ones that bounce against the squash cube wall that's ego make it onto the page... more do so when compared with treating thought as the wall and the effective structure for the rubber ball to bounce against. me playing squash? oh yes, very much so, loved it, played about 4 times a week, better than tennis, which is why no squash tournaments are televised, it's not really a spectator sport, it's too enjoyable to have a passive public... it's a sport with the player in mind, like a horse attached to a carriage with those shutters over their eyes; so now what? is poetry not allowed to look like a ******* painting, randomised and incoherent when compared to the standard practices of narrators?
Continue reading...
47
painting pictures in my head with the brush of memories that exist because i do & so do you discovering & remembering being in two places at once: here & the part where i'm not anymore two narrators in my mind: soak it all in, it's beautiful & because you soon you won't be here browsing through the works of art stone carved in my mind will sustain me & soothe the pain of missing the pieces of my heart i don't get to touch everyday & from now until i hold them again my mantra will be: these goodbye's are temporary soon we will meet on the other side of ourselves & i can't wait to get to know you again
0
Dec 16, 2015
Dec 16, 2015 at 4:45 PM UTC
i don't like leaving
One step back, two steps forward, Swing around and do the dance, Keep it fast, a little awkward A whole world audience to entrance. Now you've got them captivated Up the tempo, raise the heat, Some may need to be sedated As they wither from your beat. Hearts loud-pounding, foreheads thumping, Gasping air among the shouts, Doomsayers bleating, markets jumping, Second guessing, full of doubts. Quite the showman, what a show, Media breathless wanting more, Fans elated, bask in tow, Others crowing, keeping score. Just the start, watch him work, Revelations by the day, Not all true, surprises lurk, Act with haste, keep foes at bay. As for us enthralled spectators Barely able to keep track, Cajoled and pressed by paid narrators, Every week a heart attack. If we can but drown the chatter, Keep a cool head, crack a smile, Train our thoughts to things that matter, Take the long view, wait a while. Let the music work its magic, His gyrations entertain, Learn that life need not be tragic, See the sunshine through the rain. RAI 5/25
0
May 3, 2025
May 3, 2025 at 1:12 PM UTC
Trump's Wild Tango
Trouillot once said, "We all serve as actors and narrators That compose the truth of history" Your 'now' is tomorrow's history, Your decisions will echo and ripple, Will you act a courageous scene? And speak truth, To cut through pools of lies? Never let anyone silence you, And that includes yourself
0
Jan 3, 2021
Jan 3, 2021 at 10:44 AM UTC
Enter Perspectivism
The cave, a discovered diary. Rock walls, pages of history. Etchings and markings A social commentary, Buried for an eternity. Lost in a melee Of storms and hurricanes And earthquakes shaking. Depictions of life, Of civilization in the making. Messages chiseled With muscle and blood, Signs of existence Where communities once stood And thrived on the need Of food through labours, The skies, the trees Their pagan saviours. Dark rains that poured Before the construction of Zion, The shifting of contours, The shaping of horizons. Art: the first form Of true communication. The observing of omens Through pictorial narration. Lessons unlearned, Warnings unheeded From a time when the promise Of future was seeded. Histories left to benefit man Before possession was borne And conflict began. A legacy left, designed by tribes From an ancient time For narrators and scribes. Their duty to record An ever-changing world Through parchment and pigment And the spoken word, For future species Of woman and man To strategise survival, To project and to plan. Knowledge more likely To be buried, interred, Then discovered too late For lessons to be learned Copyright Marc Hawkins 2017
0
Sep 11, 2017
Sep 11, 2017 at 2:17 AM UTC
AUGURIUM
The last letter of blatant words condemns one’s thoughts Yet, truth and lies hurt in our freedom of religion Unbelievers speak and fight their own slanderous path Yet, modern romanticism thrives in bitter sweet times Writers critique riddled lyrics and light of knowledge Yet, question wordless replies that have doubt to smile Lame philosophy torments innocence minds like grains of sands Yet, eternity calls outcry in the sword of defence Unbendingly cliché, the stern morality of betrayal Yet, our hearts voice goodwill without idleness What do you have in the ability to survive in the external world Yet, the division between persona and new blood Christianity exist Mixing fact with fiction how fluid is identity with unreliable narrators Yet, they are purged with pride though still live in darkness of the past But, no man or woman has written their epitaph Yet, the anonymous voice has the final say of words
0
Sep 11, 2018
Sep 11, 2018 at 2:37 PM UTC
Yet
its two in the morning and i remember the nights when i was 11 and i tried to understand my true nature and became afraid and confused because the more i asked why i felt or thought some thing or way the less i was sure that i had no ulterior motives (this is how i spent my weekends when i was not comparing the local colleges- yes, i was very fun at parties) i hadn't words for it then just frustration and shame but tonight, in the moonlight i found them "the world is a story, and we are all nothing more than untrustworthy narrators," i thought over popcorn and juice but i was so young, too young when i started to ponder what my actions and beliefs could really mean i wouldnt say im smarter now i wouldnt say im more at peace but really, the best thing ive done done for myself is forget how to think
0
Oct 7, 2019
Oct 7, 2019 at 5:30 AM UTC
if choosing ignorance over anxiety was an art form then i'd have nearly mastered it
Probabilistic thinkers post hoc narrators, experience teaches us mistakes, we learn to walk by falling down. we never really learn to fly.
0
Nov 15, 2022
Nov 15, 2022 at 4:25 PM UTC
Probably, hit or miss.
that's one of the reasons that i don't "think"                                           that **** sapiens*    exists...             it seems that from *dementia praecox's* evolution into schiozophrenia has allowed a poetic evolution of spreschen...                      you can write subjectivity and subjectivity,        completely devoid of polar attitudes as to how the word is accomplished   in a sentence...   but in terms of objectivity?    you always tend to side with the people who cite "objectivity",        i.e. third party narrators...    these this precursor stress                                        for a necessity of ambiguity... fuck's sake, like inverting a caron    into a circumflex...                ^ > <              ? the ****       yeah... manga     why wasn't it ever > <                                          _             ? ob.                             human animal                      sub.    if there's a subconsciousness,    surely, given the prefix-rule,   there must also be an obconsciousness...     that's ******* with my mind right now...   but, after all, there's the categorical foundation...                   we already have puritan objectivity... it's called physics... dynamic (ɔ) - an "invisible" hand:        ball (p) smacks against ball (b) and you have the dynamic (c),    i.e. ball (p) stops moving,               and ball (b) moves from     the interaction.                journalism isn't a science,   you can't be objective as such,                 you don't have the safety of                           a lab. slothing away at some mundane experiment...       in journalism you only have 1 chance... you don't get to compare                       within the concept    of heidegger's dasein...          you're there, be a ******* journalist! objectivity to me is a myth of   pompous brats who really want to reach the apathetic potential of                             a psychopath; that's all they're doing,                       imitating psychopathy; and might i add? very poorly...            the ultimate psychopaths, i.e. giving the most objective: oops?                       the manhattan project...   so yeah...    "objectively" speaking i'm a late cousin of harambe (the gorilla)...    but subjectively i'm equipped    with the ability to write,   something like this, rather than reduce myself to a rainbow onomatopoeia of     syllables, imitating a human   coughing or sneezing or laughing,   rather than a gorilla intimidating         a contender for his abode and harem.
0
Jun 27, 2017
Jun 27, 2017 at 11:03 AM UTC
dynamic (ɔ), ball (p), ball (b), dynamic (c)
that's one of the reasons that i don't "think"                                           that **** sapiens*    exists...             it seems that from *dementia praecox's* evolution into schiozophrenia has allowed a poetic evolution of spreschen...                      you can write subjectivity and subjectivity,        completely devoid of polar attitudes as to how the word is accomplished   in a sentence...   but in terms of objectivity?    you always tend to side with the people who cite "objectivity",        i.e. third party narrators...    these this precursor stress                                        for a necessity of ambiguity... fuck's sake, like inverting a caron    into a circumflex...                ^ > <              ? the ****       yeah... manga     why wasn't it ever > <                                          _             ? ob.                             human animal                      sub.    if there's a subconsciousness,    surely, given the prefix-rule,   there must also be an obconsciousness...     that's ******* with my mind right now...   but, after all, there's the categorical foundation...                   we already have puritan objectivity... it's called physics... dynamic (ɔ) - an "invisible" hand:        ball (p) smacks against ball (b) and you have the dynamic (c),    i.e. ball (p) stops moving,               and ball (b) moves from     the interaction.                journalism isn't a science,   you can't be objective as such,                 you don't have the safety of                           a lab. slothing away at some mundane experiment...       in journalism you only have 1 chance... you don't get to compare                       within the concept    of heidegger's dasein...          you're there, be a ******* journalist! objectivity to me is a myth of   pompous brats who really want to reach the apathetic potential of                             a psychopath; that's all they're doing,                       imitating psychopathy; and might i add? very poorly...            the ultimate psychopaths, i.e. giving the most objective: oops?                       the manhattan project...   so yeah...    "objectively" speaking i'm a late cousin of harambe (the gorilla)...    but subjectively i'm equipped    with the ability to write,   something like this, rather than reduce myself to a rainbow onomatopoeia of     syllables, imitating a human   coughing or sneezing or laughing,   rather than a gorilla intimidating         a contender for his abode and harem.
Continue reading...
74