.
2 + 2 is a tautology of 2 x 2, isn't it?
of note, both Joyce and Beckett sampled
something of a learning,
in terms of understanding
the alphabet of surds:
of musical notes, in writing...
you fit me a ******* symphony
of music encoding into your brain...
and i tell you:
you're playing hum
of the vibrating universe while
you're at it... savvy?
year 2019 contra the year 2018...
and some think that mixing
whiskey with anything,
which included ice cubes
and pepsi is a profanity...
i once ****** into a a glass
of wine and made the salute:
and here's my blood,
i bit my nails and said:
and here's my body...
might as well add to the mix...
but... kalimotxo:
god and the high heavens
forbid this to be a profanity!
what comes first,
coco in France,
or kalimotxo in revising
my numbed *** sitting on
the yet to congested
discovery of boredom?
probably the latter:
in that...
oh i'm far from bored...
i've experienced something
that dictates to me:
death is but a precursor...
i'm not afraid of death
therefore i can't seem
to succumb to boredom,
it's this persistent
agitative nagging of:
well...
if you can't conjure up
a ******* hammer...
might as well be the nail,
or a gaping lack
of either hammer, or nail!
****...
productive "thinking":
if ever an antithesis
of "nothing"...
well... i can only think of one...
the only antithesis of
"nothing" is: thinking,
or...
the over way around...
the only thesis
of nothing is: "thinking"...
metaphors salute!
custard pie in the making:
fudge for logic...
why did i abscond
remixing the "blood of Christ"
for the **** of
alcoholic norse gods
raining on
Scotch hinter canvases
of fields surrounded
by mountains
and lochects?
mind you...
******* into a glass of wine...
is not very much
akin to pouring
pepsi into it...
but in terms of:
adding to the experience
of the living poetics?
hum...
exactly!
the only antithesis
of nihil (nothing) is cogitare
(thought)... or?
ratio (reason)...
nothing is not a geometric
entity...
forget looking for it
in Buddha's third eye /
the Hindu bindi...
nothing is neither
"existent" or "non-existent"
it is no thing
in the same way that
it is no void /
or absence...
it perpetuates
the cycle of living off
thought...
or thinking:
if thought can be a continuum
known as thinking,
rather than a random
array of "plagiarizms" /
eurekas of an idea...
nihil est cogitare...
how much of thought
is lost and never materialized...
it has to "go" somewhere,
doesn't it...
isn't that what is the antithesis
of that German's
da-sein?
i.e.
wo-nicht-sein?
wonichtsein...
where is non-being?
isn't that the same as....
there is being...
where's where (?)
(tautology inquisitive)
and
there's there (!)
(tautology self-congrats.,
like some Taoist monk!)
well **** me...
where's there?
and...
there's where?
THE-ER IS "WH'-ERE"...
ah...
i see...
but no one can still point to novels
from the 20th century,
i.e. notably Beckett and Joyce
and how...
they were able to write music...
i can't read music...
all i have is
the concept of the ring,
a circle, and nazgûl:
or rather the language they speak...
close to the circle... shh...
prove:
that ℕ was not borrowed
from ᚻ...
right... instead of musical
notes...
to write a piece of logic...
******* in a glass of wine
to double up on the poetics
seems much "easier"
well...
cogito (A) ⊢ sum (B)?
or: encoding math is a music
you listen to:
on funerals...
→
well yeah ¬(¬A) "=" A...
the negation of a negation of A
is... A...
what would have happened
if Nietzsche wrote:
beyond truth and falsehood...
unless
¬(¬A) "=" A isn't good
then i guess
so much for the "beyond"
or good and evil...
now we have rampant
indifference to any
¬(¬A) "=" A
and a "dignified highground"
of observable
"nuances"...
infernal tautology:
good isn't good is good,
i.e. good (A)
A(¬A(A)) -
good isn't good is good...
i'm not even going to start to understand
this infernal shortscript
language competently...
so much for propositional
logic...
isn't metaphysics:
prepositional logic?
or is that: post-positional
logic?
after a while there are just too many
nouns laced with synonyms,
a yard becomes just as much
as a mile,
and neither are at all differentiated,
then nuance comes in
and even more is lost...
you want mathematicians
to go crazy?
give them a ******* thesaurus.