Hello Poetry
Submit your work and get some sparkles! Create free account
"imagie" poems
you are beautiful like a dream where the sunset is forever and the season is always spring you are lovely like a picture of a blooming flower where dreams come true each time you open your eyes you are the embodiment of beauty and the reason why it even exist you inspire goddesses with the color of your eyes, so they make angels after your imagie but then again you are a goddess yourself blessing me every time your presence, when it's near because your presence is a present alone
0
Oct 2, 2017
Oct 2, 2017 at 6:31 PM UTC
Desire
contentious retraction of a failed dualism, happy schizophrenia, my money is "biased" in metaphor: little people, little needs, the rest remains a gargantuan enterprise... little fool, little fowl: and from a grain of sand, a unit, to conceptualiße the breadth and depth of tme.... little people: you know: belittle differences, market the gains... trip and attempt to fall. oh, i took the noun confusion to be an artefsact associated with your, profession being taken seriously? my bad... because aren't lawyers the only, "true", readers, of a thesaurus? nibbling qusi-vermin, you could almost squash them with an ****** impetus at spotting a cockroach... thing with rats... esp. of a certain ethnic disposition that is hardly an allowance... anglo goorl with a **** beefie? how's that 'elping you? good? **** the rest and confiscate the retired nearing death.... i'm bothered though... about jurisprudence without a thesaurus... see... i don't think it would be applicable, let alone passable to pass a blah, without a thesaurus.... let alone the rule of: thumb... i already presuppose the dictionary definition, but i suppose you don't, given that the thesaurus is contaminated with a higher status when compared to a dictionary.... in most instances the fabric of the kantian gensis 0 = negation doesn't even qualify as (a) genesis... in the fabric of: the "inconvenience" of stating law... we have to resort to "demanding" metaphor... god forbid this childish prank of permanently effectuating a posit of nuance; given the leverage, that demands a portion of the living: to speak for the dead. yes, perfected "imperfect" english can sometimes spot a chance to avoid using articles, given that there are only two to mind... but jurisprudence is as much about excavating past the prime from a thesaurus, as it is about reading a, ******* dictionary... gnome language... the square: isn't a square type of people... can't help but imagie a hellish dentistry session... bleeding gums, healthy teeth being pulled out without anaesthetic... you know, the atypical sort of sadism, and dada.
0
Jun 14, 2018
Jun 14, 2018 at 10:31 AM UTC
jurisprudence without a thesaurus
contentious retraction of a failed dualism, happy schizophrenia, my money is "biased" in metaphor: little people, little needs, the rest remains a gargantuan enterprise... little fool, little fowl: and from a grain of sand, a unit, to conceptualiße the breadth and depth of tme.... little people: you know: belittle differences, market the gains... trip and attempt to fall. oh, i took the noun confusion to be an artefsact associated with your, profession being taken seriously? my bad... because aren't lawyers the only, "true", readers, of a thesaurus? nibbling qusi-vermin, you could almost squash them with an ****** impetus at spotting a cockroach... thing with rats... esp. of a certain ethnic disposition that is hardly an allowance... anglo goorl with a **** beefie? how's that 'elping you? good? **** the rest and confiscate the retired nearing death.... i'm bothered though... about jurisprudence without a thesaurus... see... i don't think it would be applicable, let alone passable to pass a blah, without a thesaurus.... let alone the rule of: thumb... i already presuppose the dictionary definition, but i suppose you don't, given that the thesaurus is contaminated with a higher status when compared to a dictionary.... in most instances the fabric of the kantian gensis 0 = negation doesn't even qualify as (a) genesis... in the fabric of: the "inconvenience" of stating law... we have to resort to "demanding" metaphor... god forbid this childish prank of permanently effectuating a posit of nuance; given the leverage, that demands a portion of the living: to speak for the dead. yes, perfected "imperfect" english can sometimes spot a chance to avoid using articles, given that there are only two to mind... but jurisprudence is as much about excavating past the prime from a thesaurus, as it is about reading a, ******* dictionary... gnome language... the square: isn't a square type of people... can't help but imagie a hellish dentistry session... bleeding gums, healthy teeth being pulled out without anaesthetic... you know, the atypical sort of sadism, and dada.
Continue reading...
80
yes I see her and I'll still see her even if I close my eyes or leave the room. I'm not obsessed with her imagie just amazed how she seems to glow so I can't help but keep on Staring when she's looking down or away from me and yeah I know she's not mine but i swear she's not his, well she is but that's not the point, the point is I'm not the point and she belongs to herself.
0
Oct 9, 2017
Oct 9, 2017 at 8:38 PM UTC
monologue I