May 23
Outside of language structuring and more into the rhetoric of philosophy;
Logos, within the frame of reference of 2nd person perspective, corresponds to our inner monologues. The mind's speech.
1st person - Perceiver - Person
2nd person - Perception - Place
3rd person - The Perceived - Thing
So whereas from the 1st person perspective, thought is merely an attribute of perception - 2nd person sees the mind as a more physical place.
A liminal space between the material & immaterial.
Therein, thought which is the inner monologue can be offered body. You can personify thought as a whole, personify thoughts in sets, or in singulars. So 3rd person would be thought which examines or experiences itself.
Logos, within the frame of reference of 2nd person perspective, corresponds to our inner monologues. The mind's speech.
1st person - Perceiver - Person
2nd person - Perception - Place
3rd person - The Perceived - Thing
So whereas from the 1st person perspective, thought is merely an attribute of perception - 2nd person sees the mind as a more physical place.
A liminal space between the material & immaterial.
Therein, thought which is the inner monologue can be offered body. You can personify thought as a whole, personify thoughts in sets, or in singulars. So 3rd person would be thought which examines or experiences itself.
Can you picture the apple?
The definitions of its shape? Discern the subtle variances in hues? Feel it? Smell it? Taste it?
Can you experience the consciousness of an apple? Experience πΈπ©π’π΅ its existence is? ππ©π¦π³π¦ it exists? ππ°πΈ it exists?
Do you think an apple which experiences itself rots? Or does it grow to be a tree?
The definitions of its shape? Discern the subtle variances in hues? Feel it? Smell it? Taste it?
Can you experience the consciousness of an apple? Experience πΈπ©π’π΅ its existence is? ππ©π¦π³π¦ it exists? ππ°πΈ it exists?
Do you think an apple which experiences itself rots? Or does it grow to be a tree?
