Jan 6
If one considers the tesseract as a worm hole that gets stronger as it traverses the distance traveled time spent to become the clairaudience clairvoyance of astral projection’s existential extremity……..I mean like what is the nature of exigence exodus’s exponentially extemporaneous. I mean given that infinite possibility is the nature of omnipresence’s omniscience and we are but a refractively reflective embodiment of its integrable form’s extant: the residual harmonic vibrations of kinetic supremacy’s trajectory.
So I ask again “Is intellectual sentience the catalyst for the evolution of God?” Perhaps if we all practice zoomorphic zoolatry on the social contiguities of demagoguery the vicarious recalcitrance of its objectified manifest's dimensional delineations will raise us all to new heights of enigmatism.
But no, we are but relatively extraneous interpolations of adhesively practical extremity. We’re not capable of transmuting our environment with the imbue in the exude of our emote, despite the concoctions we xenobiotic prosthesis. We are incapable of interceding en masse on our own behalf as an integrated unit. We don’t amount to the seven five six-y on it to eight. We are more the four-ness of three given the two-y-ness of one. The 3D macro of the fecundity of micro’s induction's fertility.
I submit:
“Before there was anything that mattered everything that would ever be existed , it was the essence of totality , it was without dimensional constriction or necessitated form . Optimistically speaking time had no relative realism to its progression because realistically nothing had happened yet . As it continued it became according to its innate inflections as a functionally integrable form . The questionably understandable nature of its conjunction was an omnipotent directive beyond necessitated action or morphological construction . The enigmatic consciousness of its relatively interrelated conception was spontaneous and yet it continued without elemental omniscience.”
And
“As the relative complexity of its interrelations evolved dimensional consistence was born. Humanly understandable laws of physical integration governed many facets of its conjunction yet the totality of its ramification was beyond humanly realistic conjecture .”
And
Given the theory of ultimate entropy and the probable cyclic nature of existence……and given that there probably was no beginning so therefore an eternity has already passed, ”I have a theory: This spatiotemporal fecundity, this creationism occurs at such an imperceptible rate that positive eons of quadrillions of ages must pass in order for the cosmos to replenish its stockpile of physical matter (possibly matter without atomic structure as we know it) so that a new cycle of infinite big bangs in infinite space can occur.”
Yes, it seems that basic gravity has extent on the extremity. Huge sections of it slowly implode until the compression causes a singularity, or so it would seem. Who knows, perhaps some of these big bangs have different periodic tables than ours. I mean why would they all be the same, given that infinite possibility is the nature of omnipresence’s ubiquity.
I like to think I cerebral cortex ****** matrix resemble but there’s a vast difference between relative rationality and rational relativity. Noumenal sentience’s semantic regalia is incorporeity ideology’s platonic proxy incarnate for after all what is the nature of problematic prosthesis to mystic symbiotics?
Protractive analyses of dimensional delineation are in order. The basic fecundity of spatiotemporal telemetry’s virility had an exogamy with the infinite vastness and the inky blackness. It’s some pretty inimitable stuff, trajectory extant and all.
So, back to the tesseract perhaps the creativities of imagination’s immaturities are teleportational translucence to transcendency verve. Then again perhaps we are corporeally preternatural finites and adjunctly juxtapositional is beyond our metaphysical mystique………I like to think not!!! Tesseract.
So I ask again “Is intellectual sentience the catalyst for the evolution of God?” Perhaps if we all practice zoomorphic zoolatry on the social contiguities of demagoguery the vicarious recalcitrance of its objectified manifest's dimensional delineations will raise us all to new heights of enigmatism.
But no, we are but relatively extraneous interpolations of adhesively practical extremity. We’re not capable of transmuting our environment with the imbue in the exude of our emote, despite the concoctions we xenobiotic prosthesis. We are incapable of interceding en masse on our own behalf as an integrated unit. We don’t amount to the seven five six-y on it to eight. We are more the four-ness of three given the two-y-ness of one. The 3D macro of the fecundity of micro’s induction's fertility.
I submit:
“Before there was anything that mattered everything that would ever be existed , it was the essence of totality , it was without dimensional constriction or necessitated form . Optimistically speaking time had no relative realism to its progression because realistically nothing had happened yet . As it continued it became according to its innate inflections as a functionally integrable form . The questionably understandable nature of its conjunction was an omnipotent directive beyond necessitated action or morphological construction . The enigmatic consciousness of its relatively interrelated conception was spontaneous and yet it continued without elemental omniscience.”
And
“As the relative complexity of its interrelations evolved dimensional consistence was born. Humanly understandable laws of physical integration governed many facets of its conjunction yet the totality of its ramification was beyond humanly realistic conjecture .”
And
Given the theory of ultimate entropy and the probable cyclic nature of existence……and given that there probably was no beginning so therefore an eternity has already passed, ”I have a theory: This spatiotemporal fecundity, this creationism occurs at such an imperceptible rate that positive eons of quadrillions of ages must pass in order for the cosmos to replenish its stockpile of physical matter (possibly matter without atomic structure as we know it) so that a new cycle of infinite big bangs in infinite space can occur.”
Yes, it seems that basic gravity has extent on the extremity. Huge sections of it slowly implode until the compression causes a singularity, or so it would seem. Who knows, perhaps some of these big bangs have different periodic tables than ours. I mean why would they all be the same, given that infinite possibility is the nature of omnipresence’s ubiquity.
I like to think I cerebral cortex ****** matrix resemble but there’s a vast difference between relative rationality and rational relativity. Noumenal sentience’s semantic regalia is incorporeity ideology’s platonic proxy incarnate for after all what is the nature of problematic prosthesis to mystic symbiotics?
Protractive analyses of dimensional delineation are in order. The basic fecundity of spatiotemporal telemetry’s virility had an exogamy with the infinite vastness and the inky blackness. It’s some pretty inimitable stuff, trajectory extant and all.
So, back to the tesseract perhaps the creativities of imagination’s immaturities are teleportational translucence to transcendency verve. Then again perhaps we are corporeally preternatural finites and adjunctly juxtapositional is beyond our metaphysical mystique………I like to think not!!! Tesseract.
The Martian warlord's universally acceptable id conclusion on the enigma entity.
