there is a rightful backlash against the defence of a monster called ill and not a terrorist
however I see more rightness in attribting ALL terrorism to illness than giving name to another demon
better for healing's sake to call the sick as they are than turn them away for fear of infection
inpired by terrible inspiration. the man was a terrorist, and the man was sick (socially). too bad we only think of motives and mental health when it comes to white, American males and not all those who commit acts of terrorism. we should consider the motivations of religious extremists and lone wolves equally. in both cases, the ills of the individual stem from the ills of the larger social organism.