it can almost be funny, waking up one day, and not knowing what day it is.
so they call it the cardinal division, of days, 7 of them...
then they have the months
in the year
and in those months they
have the numbers of days
days are lated divided into
hours, minutes, moods...
then there are the 4 popes,
known as seasons,
and those are a basis to explain
the "odd" moods -
then there's the cohort known
as year, the three-hundred-and-sixty-five
spartans...
and this is the world we live in...
but i still don't know what day it is...
for the past hour spent perched on
a windowsill, smoking cigarettes
and drinking ***** sharpshooters
that might allow me to stop coughing
and puking (the milk didn't help)
i read five book reviews
from a saturday edition of *the times...
1. irresistable -
well, that's how i say it, i'm bored
with writing irresistible,
does the vowel variation matter? -
irresistible: why we can't stop
checking, scrolling, clicking and watching
by adam alter, review by janice turner...
2. the catholics, by roy hattersley,
review by gerrard degroot
3. the raqqa diaries, by samer, review by
anthony loyd
4. on tyranny, by timothy snyder,
review by michael gove...
and lastly
5. from bacteria to bach and back,
by daniel dennett, review by oliver moody...
huh?
that's basically gender studies in a nut-shell,
only 1 woman among the 5 reviewers...
and what's currently bothering woman...
i could just watch a cliche of some sort,
somewhere just as well...
what day is it?!
oh i'm not going to jump on the bandwagon
and check the digital keepers of time,
there's a saturday newspaper in my hand,
the clock on my computer is showing the time to be
21:31... but given it's windows programme is
set to a reality of: being in poland...
i'm starting to suspect it's sunday...
well, i don't have a smartphone so here's to me
getting twitchy about checking it...
so 20th century, for me the internet isn't
even mobile... it's stationary, anchored by a laptop
in a room, and nowhere else...
i don't know how many book reviews i read
and not the actual books,
i'd say a few... hundred...
and then how many books i've read
that are not reviewed...
some because they're "boring",
some because they're hard,
some because so many people have read
them over the years there's this feeling
of letting them go...
like that imaginary friend in inside out...
like don quixote...
it has to be a new thing, having to stop
reading the actual books, and rather the reviews
of the books, as a way to catch up?
i probably won't want to remember them
anyway...
i'just the sheer perplexity,
how the japanese mastered the haiku,
and lo! behold! the grant poet of osaka,
who produced 20 haikus in 20 years...
getting ******, watching the moon...
what discipline... what discipline to inquire into
not boring someone...
but as they say in the west:
be a miserable **** and they'll keep
coming back, due to the principle
of schadenfreude...
that's the main point about poetry in the west,
and how it can spiral out of control
when otherwise japanese poetry can't...
i call that discipline... and this? lack of it...
equivalent to eating a hamburger.
you want a modern poem?
my history of playing video games and then
suddenly stopping?
modern... right now...
never went beyond PS 1...
that's modern, isn't it?
then i did a nacht der langen messer
elsewhere on "social" media...
from over 300 contacts... to 13 random preferences...
just seeing peoples lives and having known
them, and then seeing their biographical techniques
started to annoy me...
and yes, review no. 4 does refer to a
reductio ad hitlerium... so the nacht... -
but it just bothered me how they did this
psychology experiment on the obvious website and
didn't tell me i could experience certain vectors working
into my psyche...
i guess i just had to reverse the experiment...
keep everything public... but reduce the size of contacts
from over 300, to 13...
and then take to creating an anonymous
profile elsewhere, without even trying to be anonymous...
since that's how writing gets done;
so it is sunday?
