this is an "etymological" petition, there's no "proof"
involved... let us just say,
why do i never, and never will
cite an english "philosopher":
frankly? because there aren't any!
i know there are worthy examples
that kindly lend their tongue
to idle ears...
but the english,
being counterparts of the swabians -
i.e. the saxons: are sophisticated
braggers of esteems -
they parade upon the notion
that they are best as gesticulation,
fathoming their superiority upon
a gimmick! they they are superior
because of their accent...
yet fathom half the work and twice
the leisure in competing with
the greeks in diacritical approach...
they really gave swallowed the
red herring... they never could
keep dialectical approach to their
already shakespearean approach
of being two-faced sheep-shaggers
while pushing them off a cliff...
that's why i can't redeem or even consider
the english a philosophical race,
poetic, yes, but their demand for replacing
the greeks as: the "philosophers"?
that's too much, it was enough that they
imitated the romans and left the latin
script edenic...
but to fathom an imitation of the greeks?
now you're pushing it!
******* bellybuttons of the world,
it has no bearing with greenwich being
the ******* meridian!
you've pushed it, far enough!
you can be the "philosophers", once
you acknowledge diacritical markings,
and eradicate dyslexia!
why are the poles so fathomable
with their tongue? clear, syllable, indicators,
diacritics = punctuation marks within
punctuation marks... which probably
means an enigma for you,
and that subsequent paraphrase.
and it's an irony, i must call it
german ironism,
for a people for efficient in work,
they were the ones to produce the most
philosophers worth citing,
i guess: once you become too efficient
you have to craft a tier of gifted bums...
intellectualism for your spare time...
which the german philosophers are,
bums,
intellectuals that can fill a room
with more furniture than a carpenter...
odiously its very much imaginative / cognitive
furniture, kinda likefeng shui,
but less so...
which is strange, since the germans
ought to be the last people able to think...
hence german ironism is a paradox
having replaced idealism,
and the yiddish zenith...
i think that's where god resides -
his curiosity made him non-existent
in the darkest hours of auschwitz -
he was like: huh? how the **** did that happen?!
there's a new fragrance in the air,
it's not some englishman with his head
in a ****,
it germanic, pure and simple,
and only if it was the anglo-swabians
and not the anglo-saxons...
******* porridge-pie for all i care...
sure, john stuart mills,
adam smith (an economist in the end) -
but the english are not a nation of philosophers,
which is odd, since they ought to be,
with however pointless jobs they invented
after having exported the meaning of labour to china,
and are the genesis of marxism,
which was tested in mongolia...
oh, you didn't know?
yeah, mongolia was the laboratory in vitro
groundwork for communism -
mongolia = in vitro communism
the warsaw pact = in vivo communism...
what?
yet the persistency of the question
that is greater than a question per se -
for a nation of such ardent workers,
such efficient workers,
such effective monstrous combatants of
economic prowess,
who, sane enough among them,
could ever provide a book of philosophy?
that's what i mean about german idealism
being replaced by das groß ironie -
the english have no chance in being philosophers:
it has become too cinematic for these people,
too: what's "real"?
i can't treat them without a whip -
they are too an obsolete a people to compete
with either germanic or, (that dreaded association)
with the fhhhhhhench...
the fwench! the fwench!
because the english have not allowed
faking work, to making certain work
obsolete, they simply made working
obsolete, and faking the most apparent form
of work! no wonder that communism
originated in england!
once more, if you don't like my scolding
whip-of-a-tongue to be on your case:
in hope you enjoy the next bomb-blast!
but, how, how could the most efficient people
on this planet, provide enough time to
guarantee a family tree of philosophers?
how could these people end up so
unimaginative and bored, as to provide the world
a kant, or a hegel?
cracks in the ceiling i see: load the ark!
- and i will never cite an englishman's thought,
for the simple reason that:
it's too late to test the englishman's
pompousness as the global meridian bellybutton!
about as centre as my ***-crack is to my nasal cavity
in my ****** geography.
i can't cite them...
i'll take these peoples seriously once
they wave goodbye to their multiplex romana -
and start bereaving their europeanism
akin to the icelandic peoples...
there is not a single greek among
them, they can fake it with their greek-cypriots -
but that gets you as far as feta cheese
a shy kofta kebab, or a moussaka.
hence das groß ironie - for a people for efficient,
so engrossed in celebrating manual labour,
der deutschevolk, to be the rightful inheritors of
the greek thought?
staggering...
unfathomable, unimaginable,
but as the statement suggest:
probably the greatest irony in world history...
i almost think there was no divine
intervention because of the creative output,
akin to a beethoven et al.
i still will not cite an english "philosopher",
for there aren't any!
and if there are:
they're probably as boring as any atheist is,
or as any naturalist can be...
plus: it's not nice to shower others with compliments,
as it's never proper
to admire another person's pair of shoes...
why? because you wouldn't swap them for yours;
the best advice you can give?
do not give any advice.
what's the worst compliment you can give
(akin to a woman asking what you're thinking)?
i like your shoes.
p.s. i've only just realised,
the germans have so so many forms
of the direct article that the english
doesn't, without only the...
but like the rule shared among the two
languages, the indirect article is
plagued by its cousin english -
eine kangaroo, ein aphrodisiac -
a cat, an ape.
