Such a naïve philosopher can I be,
not opposed to a skeptic philosopher,
but rather in tandem with it.

Such a naïve philosopher,
not necessarily in terms of Realism,
but certainly in some terms.

Such a naïve philosopher,
yet such a skeptic one as well:

I'm not the best of both worlds,
maybe the rest of both worlds;
I'm testing both worlds,
contesting both worlds;
ingesting both worlds,
detesting both worlds;
bereft of both worlds,
in jest of both words:

I don't
exactly see
how the two
are mutually
exclusive:

Naïvety and Skepticism
seem to be a match well made.

But, by inner Skeptic
is calling me Naïve.