Shall I observe a drunk man stumble across the street and say, "This is a poor man, whose inner-self is in such turmoil that he must nullify it with alcohol. Somewhere, he has chosen wrongly in life and may I not retrace the errors that have produced such wrong"?
Or shall I point at a beggar and say, "This is a poor man, whose condition is so outwardly wretched, even God seems to cast him away in disgust. Somewhere, he has chosen wrongly in life and may I not retrace the errors that have produced such wrong"?
Although, such retrospective thoughts come with some truth, it is also accompanied with great vulgarity. Who is unworthy of love? Thus, who can be deprived the chance for change? We all must fail in at least one thing, why persecute those with courage to live through failure?
The lesson learned from such men is not in the now. It is in the past, which bears realities which none can alter, and in the future, of which any can change. Is there a man more admirable, worthy of love, than he who overcomes his past?
Are you aware of the pasts of those around? And yet how quickly we can judge. How many times have we dismissed someone on the cusp of something great? We are all worthy of love, who are we to spend it sparingly?
To the drunk, I bid him good cheer and good luck, and to the beggar, I will buy him bread. These men are capable of great change.