you would never say about a Kandinsky: where's the Mondrian? luckily we have enough information about Goldberg's sardines, without asking another poet (other than O'Hara) to sniff out Billingsgate - and so too: if Burroughs said: all writing limps behind painting by 50 years - enough said, hence came speedy Gonzales with his shotgun and his canned paint... and i know just as much as sardines in see-through tins - well: it was worth a joke, someone was bound to **** into a champagne bottle at some point, and celebrate: in abstract - or to the point: in concreto - ecce artifex! at least enough humility would be worth the same dosage - specialisations are such: demanding concepts as aboriginal in anthropology - likewise anthropological: schizophrenics in urbanity - after all... a concrete jungle - like any half-wit and ****-naked in the Amazon... applause for comrade Gagarin and Laika - and if Darwin wrote in cyrilica - then it too would have been Mohawk and Brain - salutations and applause - and if ever in doubt: call it versailles - to denote all forms of luxury - i know: versailles better hides luxury than the hermitage - or as King Duck could say being a burden on the Vavel Mount - even the Vavellian dragon died from laughter, even though he was given a sheep stuffed with sulphur - and drank the Vistulla dry... but only when King Quack was laid to rest: and the volk - the naród said: Katyń 1 - Smoleńsk 3... and there was even a composition by wojciech kilar. so then... 50 years lagging? disorientating? muddled, spaghetti loops? well, as the introduction already mentions, painters can't write - suddenly everything has to have geometry! any geometrical instrument in an art's class is seen like a Sunni in Iran - or a Buddhist, at a Bar Mitzvah: boom-town slap-head - choppy waters, brightly illuminated by the polished cranium sheen. so why except a Mondrain from a Kandinsky ?! what a brain-drain!