i think it can be, universally, acknowledged:
that:
the political emphasis
on protection the rights of women...
elevating them (even)...
from any sort of perspective worked:
up to: the point: but... otherwise:
there came a conundrum of:
so... we are told to protect our species
via *** X...
but *** X is unwilling... or... whatever to meet
the demands of the universally sparing existence
argument being: better this toil and untold
misery: than nothing at all...
it's rather strange that we defend women
in their currency of freedom and infanticide...
clearly giving them the same
clarity of the "question" of "worth"
akin to men who had to...
imagine the slaughters of **** of Genghis Khan
and then the microcosm of abortion...
i don't know why we would need to fight for
the rights of half of the species so willing
to play the ultra-nihilism game
that's otherwise reserved for the masculine
crux of the lost endeavor...
why would we... want to protect women...
if... infanticide is the ultimate measure: corrupt...
why would i want to defend women and
their rights... if their sole concern for
rights
is for a quantum universe of me
being unable to say so
because... m'eh... the imported living potential
of other cultures where this value
is not under-nourished by the spasm-of-solipsism:
why defend women...
if women opt for staging the right to abort children:
what sick... minority voice-over is
dictating the rule of the index:
when society expects the rule of thumb?!
what sick minds operate on the guarantee
that women alive: can...
abort children...
why are they excused from manslaughter
when the evidence is: SYMBIOSIS...
what ******* crux of the impossible
blindness is SYMBIOSIS this PARASITE
what what what?!
**** it... learn to drive a car last...
learn to bicycle... learn to swim...
learn to ride a ******* HORSE...
**** a woman...
then get to grips with the gears
and the clutch 20 years later...
hey presto: learn to cook a mean pasta in-between.