i can finally understand the concept of
hurt emotions...
well... because i can understand
the concept of emotion of people who
have never had an original thought...
the people who advocate...
not, not hurting other people's emotions,
as the people, glorifying thinking,
without having an original thought
to begin with...
  i can understand being
emotionally hurt...
it implies: being driven out of
the ontological neutrality of apathy
that allows you to think...
some or any sort of narrative...
i'm finding it hard...
        for the necessarily
agitated, "cognitively"...
                they feel nothing,
and whenever they "feel" something,
it's nothing more than a lack
of an original thinking...
feeling? that's individualistic...
i don't understand the argument
from the posit of superiority...
thinking is no lesser a feeling,
than feeling is a more than thinking...
i experience more by feeling
than i ever could wish my thinking
to be, or become...
thinking is an a posteriori subject...
yet feeling is an a priori object...
i can't glorify thinking...
   thinking and facts are two
segregated entities of modulations...
feeling...
             feeling is irrational...
so why bother giving feeling
a fact, a past, a present,
a future?!
               i can understand
hurt feelings...
as enzymes, metaphors,
motivations...
        hurt feelings cannot,
ever be, "hurt" thoughts...
the "hurt" from thinking has its
avenue of explanatory fabric...
difficult arithmetic,
notably algebraic in nature...
so... "hurt" feelings...
how about your, hurt "thoughts"?
oh come on!
even i don't remember
the details of solving quadratic equations!
fudge-packaged-brain-drain-drudge?!