I construct an abstract argument 
and for arguments sake let us believe
that an abstract is a viable construct.

This is an argument where any given abstract
is seeded from outside a circumference where
the diameter is greater than minus zero and the
resultant abstraction gives a positive result.

I lose the argument every time.

The validity lies in the lie we believe,
arguments that deceive us into
accepting the abstract as part of the
construct

basically we're..you know what
I'm not even going there.