well, wasn't it so oh so beautiful once upon a time: a naked man holding a fruit - fast-forward.... a monkey holding a rat: hmm... enter Elvis: ahum ahum hum: shimmies aways... if genesis was to be rewritten again it would be a monkey holding a rat thinking about a tailor and a barber with a schizoid format of interpretation of an octopus! said whaaaaaaaa-t? said that. maze needs no rat, rat needs no maze, man needs both rat and maze - but man doesn't need rat, when he's already acquired a need for a maze... and there's the: a need to acquire a maze and disavow a rat... the human "concept" of a soul: or animation force - has become degenerate from monkey through to rat... if the ancient Adam was naked holding a bitten-into apple; modern "man" is but a monkey holding a rat. i'm far from casting the logic of counting or spelling... even though i can do both... that man needs a maze but not the rat... in reality: the rat is not welcome... but to conduct a proof / pirson of meaning there is a rat: in a maze... so Tetris is debunked... and? the monkey has evolved and thus devolved to a rat status! no... wrong... technology supports the antithesis... the rat is the proof that a monkey is in a cage, and can peel a banana! ****, wrong answer: the rat can bite off its own snout! ¡ay, caramba! wrong again? can anyone be right using this ******* spreschen?!