needless to say, that's £90.00 spent on merely two books, musings II - VI & VII - XI of the schwarznotizbuch, by that "infamous" ****, disillusioned with the party within 2 years or so of joining ot; alternatively a study of the third *****'s university environment, which is necessary reading in the anglophone sphere zeitgeist; as ever: quintessential timing (on my part) to invest and peruse in such expensive reading material. - and in no way related, how pitiable it seems, from the year circa 1460 there will still be the romance surrounding Vladimir III, as with every tyrant, the damning and subsequent onion stripping of the unravelling of a man amongst men... poo'h whittle Adolf will not leave a legacy akin to the romance of Wallachia, precursored on the screaming impaled... unlike other tyrants of fabled lore, poo'h Dolphi will only a joke, a very bad joke, or what has or will become the death of comedy in the English speaking world... not some mythical spectre akin to Barbarossa, or a sensibility of Bismarck... if you begin humourising at the beginning, the jokes hardly pack the punch, given that comedy has reached the same fate as art, in that comedy has become, comedy for comedy's sake, that dreaded Kantian Box, where everything goes when made redundant, exhausted, or unintelligent / challenging in the pop medium of slapstick, rather than kings' court of a jester's satire of power.*

it's almost staggering to believe
   that there's an alternative
  offence to: "hurting" someone's
feelings, or rather it is a case
of agitating apathy - in that
  the argument follows concerning
hurt emotions, when in fact
  it is a giving birth to emotions
from a comfortable state of apathy,
coincidental with automated
   "thinking"; how simpler the scenario
becomes concerning the parallel
  of "hurt" thoughts,
   notably in the form of
    arithmetic...
                e.g. √x + 2x × 1/2y ÷ z/0.99
that thick custard blob
   is already bulging in the mind,
agonising all unfathomable
    thoughtless voids with a
answer; and yet such problems
are avoided at best,
   or, man willing, solved...
       but as to why man is suddenly
able to solve the "arithmetic"
     of the case of feelings is quiet
  another: for in the former case
man can play the sloth and give
up... in the latter?
          much harder to:
    a. recognise prior apathy
     b. receive "insult"
   c. insulate it
       d. choose between
     an implosion or an explosion
  - culminating in -
    d. return to an apathetic
    state of "calm"...
       or what this comparison
proved, in that it did prove
       the quickened reaction of the latter
scenario: or for that matter -
to have hurt someone's "feelings"
  is to have actually agitated
  feelings out of their
  apathetic cocoon.