objectification, sorry, i'm a little bit confused:
so it's not o.k. when a woman's
body is objectified,
but it'd necessarily "correct"
   to disqualify a man's argument on
the basis that he's not "objective" enough?
a woman's genitals, objects that they are
can't be objectified,
but a man's intellect has to suddenly become
a ******* cesspool of a congregational:
in your honour *******?
so a woman can get away by being
objectified for her reproductive objects,
but a man has to be subjected
as his ego "magically" turning into
a phallus for a "wrong" opinion?!
                 last time i checked an object was
just that, an object...
                          i can't be even bothered
arguing this statement outside
a chimp confinery....
     thank **** i don't need to *******...
let some camel-jockey do the hard bit...
beta male?
beyond that, there's no beta or alpha
left in me, there's only omega.
                    male.
                      i'm done...
         hey presto, enter houdini,
pinch and a dozen of *****,
                          last time was the lobster
          taken on: a free thrill.