Sep 2017
that's it! i've had, enough!
english existentialism is crude, too crude
for my liking -
it's a comic book script -
and a ****** mess -
it obliterated history, it obliterated
yesterday, and sure as ****:
it will obliterate tomorrow -
my turn: to obliterate today.
the english, i find: really don't like reading -
unlike the russians -
i read it once: the russians read,
as if their life depended on it...
while europe was expressing its fine
details and sorrow:
the english were in a sleepy state
of blakean lullaby...
yes: but at least the icelandic people:
are not ****** pompous about
their natural borders beginning
with S and ending in E;
i mean, it's no wonder sometimes -
given the current climate of digested
literature,
i'm sure there are no mature readers
in england, or at least: i've never met
one! adults reading harry potter without
any sort of shame,
the lunatics will lead the blind,
and young with old souls will dupe
the young with... young souls...
just like the old play games with the young:
the most unusual perk of being old:
fake it... and then turn into
a eclair surprise of sucker-punching
a youth, while performing a zui quan
punch...
absolutely no existentialism,
everything's so ******* egalitarian...
when it's not,
ants in your pants
your shoes are on fire...
double-faced liars...
i mean... the only existential points
of interest in english existentialism are?
somewhere along the line of
evolutionary "chronology" -
and the big bang...
i still love the interplay of these four
words:
bang (a) ******* hole...
cat's out of the bag, can't him back in,
ask schrödinger to bring a few boxes
from the store house...
in the meantime, we'll also build
a cardboard box castle we'll call home,
then put everything on social media
and then you can have what i already
suggested:
people living in the already present
glass houses, reached a new zenith:
glass people, living in glass houses.
the english have no existentialism,
they got the bore-ism,
much cartoon fakery and all that
techno whizz kid jazz...
no wait... there's one good example of
"existentialism" -
but it's treated like a footnote...
even though it's in a collection of works
that also includes camus & marcus aurelius...
william hazlitt's: on the pleasure of hating;
and to be honest? that's about it.
i'm just bored of: this is not objective
enough... what, so detach myself from
subjectivity and argue like a psychopath?
that's what you're implying!
i can say with calm 2 + 2 = 4...
but if i have to say some complex
arithmetic... i will either brood over it,
pensive... but at the same time:
i know i am prone to some sort of frustration!
but at least both can be deemed healthy
reactions...
now ask for the psychopathic maxim,
yes? what is it?
apathy breeds no pathology...
see, psychopaths are oblivious to emotions,
they have cool arguments,
if you mentioned a "necessary"
distinction between subjectivity being
"negative" and objectivity being "positive",
they'd reply: i can't tell the difference:
oh, you mean the thrill of argument / act?
i can't give that away.
the germans had existentialism,
the norwegians have it, the swedes had it
with ingmar bergman,
the poles had it with krzysztof kieślowski,
the russians had it, heavens!
even the french had it!
esp. given that we're still trapped in
the caveman existentialism extending from
darwinism...
i'm not a caveman... i go to a cafe and drink
coffee, i'm tired of hearing this biological
history ******* without civilisation...
there's a reasonable cut-off point,
there are reasons why you cut off pieces
and live in the present...
esp., oh boy... a video like this,
entitled: why women pass up good guys for
players...
honey, that "question" just flew past my head,
can't think why, nor will i,
i've seen a few prostitutes to wonder
about a "why";
mind you... upon that fabled plateau
of the ovarian desert: party's up...
guy's - make sure you've seen an
actual ******* first: it'll ease the blow
with regards to what you'll be settling with;
now, that doesn't get plainer english
as that.
english existentialism is crude, too crude
for my liking -
it's a comic book script -
and a ****** mess -
it obliterated history, it obliterated
yesterday, and sure as ****:
it will obliterate tomorrow -
my turn: to obliterate today.
the english, i find: really don't like reading -
unlike the russians -
i read it once: the russians read,
as if their life depended on it...
while europe was expressing its fine
details and sorrow:
the english were in a sleepy state
of blakean lullaby...
yes: but at least the icelandic people:
are not ****** pompous about
their natural borders beginning
with S and ending in E;
i mean, it's no wonder sometimes -
given the current climate of digested
literature,
i'm sure there are no mature readers
in england, or at least: i've never met
one! adults reading harry potter without
any sort of shame,
the lunatics will lead the blind,
and young with old souls will dupe
the young with... young souls...
just like the old play games with the young:
the most unusual perk of being old:
fake it... and then turn into
a eclair surprise of sucker-punching
a youth, while performing a zui quan
punch...
absolutely no existentialism,
everything's so ******* egalitarian...
when it's not,
ants in your pants
your shoes are on fire...
double-faced liars...
i mean... the only existential points
of interest in english existentialism are?
somewhere along the line of
evolutionary "chronology" -
and the big bang...
i still love the interplay of these four
words:
bang (a) ******* hole...
cat's out of the bag, can't him back in,
ask schrödinger to bring a few boxes
from the store house...
in the meantime, we'll also build
a cardboard box castle we'll call home,
then put everything on social media
and then you can have what i already
suggested:
people living in the already present
glass houses, reached a new zenith:
glass people, living in glass houses.
the english have no existentialism,
they got the bore-ism,
much cartoon fakery and all that
techno whizz kid jazz...
no wait... there's one good example of
"existentialism" -
but it's treated like a footnote...
even though it's in a collection of works
that also includes camus & marcus aurelius...
william hazlitt's: on the pleasure of hating;
and to be honest? that's about it.
i'm just bored of: this is not objective
enough... what, so detach myself from
subjectivity and argue like a psychopath?
that's what you're implying!
i can say with calm 2 + 2 = 4...
but if i have to say some complex
arithmetic... i will either brood over it,
pensive... but at the same time:
i know i am prone to some sort of frustration!
but at least both can be deemed healthy
reactions...
now ask for the psychopathic maxim,
yes? what is it?
apathy breeds no pathology...
see, psychopaths are oblivious to emotions,
they have cool arguments,
if you mentioned a "necessary"
distinction between subjectivity being
"negative" and objectivity being "positive",
they'd reply: i can't tell the difference:
oh, you mean the thrill of argument / act?
i can't give that away.
the germans had existentialism,
the norwegians have it, the swedes had it
with ingmar bergman,
the poles had it with krzysztof kieślowski,
the russians had it, heavens!
even the french had it!
esp. given that we're still trapped in
the caveman existentialism extending from
darwinism...
i'm not a caveman... i go to a cafe and drink
coffee, i'm tired of hearing this biological
history ******* without civilisation...
there's a reasonable cut-off point,
there are reasons why you cut off pieces
and live in the present...
esp., oh boy... a video like this,
entitled: why women pass up good guys for
players...
honey, that "question" just flew past my head,
can't think why, nor will i,
i've seen a few prostitutes to wonder
about a "why";
mind you... upon that fabled plateau
of the ovarian desert: party's up...
guy's - make sure you've seen an
actual ******* first: it'll ease the blow
with regards to what you'll be settling with;
now, that doesn't get plainer english
as that.
