rhetoric conjures up the most
ambivalent compound-nouns,
e.g.:
cultural-relativism...
cultural? relavitism?
you can't do that?
**** yay!
i'll butcher someone
on a monday,
and you end up calling
me a boy-scout on a friday...
**** yeah!
might as well have been
a piece of redied kosher meat,
no?
rhetoric breeds
the most obnoxious sets of ideas,
fickle scheming
bunch of *******...
horn-beggars, squatting misers,
the lard fudge,
the insolent brigadiers...
as i said:
a stick: has two ends!
you hit with one,
you get hit by the other!
test me, *******,
source yourself as media
lucky with your soros...
go on, i'm waiting to see your
paycheck...
journalism, is fake
throughout, it doesn't mind
whether it's coorporate or
independent...
it's all fake right now...
the only true
journalism is done by people
who recite their own
clamour of life's effort,
those who summon the
angelic-demons who state:
don't convene.
man
was hardly a man when
he convened,
he simply turned into a monkey...
isolated?
well... sorta godly,
best replenished by isolated
examples of exceptional deviance.
thing is...
i can understand moral-relativism,
that abhorrent scale that the greeks
scorned...
but cultural-relativism?
that's a rhetorical ****...
it's not even a question,
it's not even a term...
i could fiddle with a pair of
******* and find more sense...
that means jack-**** to me!
50ml of jack daniels
means more to me than
the term "cultural-relavitism"...
manhattan relative
to the amazon rainforest,
is that a relative worth pile
of comparison, or is
that, sarcasm?
i'm too drunk to make a choice...
cultural relativism...
ha ha... ha ha!
is that:
frankenstein = dracula?
you know why i
understand moral relativism?
the concept of ambiguity:
the soldier vs. the murderer...
isn't that an ambiguity?
that's moral relativism for you:
i can't tell the two apart...
the **** is "cultural relativism"?
some sort of bad joke?
a dog's **** worth of concern
for a missing bark?
****-head *******; die.
