just above that tier of humor known as sarcasm there is the Elder Irony and Irony is wedded to Rhetoria... Irony is the Husband and Rhetoric is the Wife and regardless of *** biological reality is such cheap waste of the bullet minds... the Daughter is Sarcasm.. so now the vile: intellectual man gets a ******... Irony i am Rhetoric she is and comes the brat Sarcasm like sanctifying the first thirst allowances of the you and the world around you and you are Pinnocchio and i am the fox... and this makes mother uncomfortable and there's so much mother of a mother not daughter of a daughter in her voice... the gangster theme: go to sleep hungry wake up like the eyes of a predator a parasitical worm in the ppupil but then the worms in the iris and then the worms in the sclera like indecisions of acne and the dead white cells like my body is a microcosm when frolick with ego ***** and all that glue and goo..
aha! now i found you!
"Shem" (שֵׁם): Singular, meaning "name". "Shemot" (שְׁמוֹת): Plural, meaning "names".
therefore? Ha-Shem-vav-Ha-Shemot... or Ha-Shem Shemot...
because we are saying: /Judaism doesn't allow for an indefinite article: a lion is not the lion akin to Scar or Mufasa...
or as such: an explicit indefinite article: implicit being: names: indefinitely plural without explicitly implying or implicitly negating... not-nuacing...
the indefinite nouns are all plural: so when something plural is to be in nouns the cats: specific to say... the Inglorious *******... Three Muskateers... but it's otherwise plural without article... dogs... cats... not the Ukraine but simply Ukraine: not A Ukraine... a particular or a universal or specifying abysses... types or typos...
ha shem: the name shemot: names names a: verb... Musubi: the name of a name of a name... but we didn't learn the name of god first... we called fire fire sooner than we could give god a name we called a stone a stone and a bird a bird and if man is the historical animal i guess even animals are hierarchical therefore man unlike ape whereby ape is political then ape is not historical and that's how Heidegger made summary in geology and said: individual, beware... just wake up at 7am and go cycle and eat a doughnut before but the point being is... as much as the cliche stands: by politicians... sorry Aristotle: but man is not a political animal... all animals are political animals but whereas humans have to give Logos and words to politics animal politics is just animalism we got politics all wrong when once upon a time we received ingrained unshakeable politics without god but within god's design of ontology vs morals about... all animals are politics: it's only humans that have the worst politics to express... man can only be truly claimed as above animal in him being a historical- evidence squabbling: proof seeking...