Submit your work, meet writers and drop the ads. Become a member
Jul 31
categorical imperative: so subtle:
you barely recognize it exists
since its existence is so subtle:
as if a Kantian counter-culture
since all the democratic chattering
and sparrow jitters:
by now all we're ingesting
and finding it hard to digest is
the western media-propaganda
complex:
like the Ah Ha'merican military-industrial
complex:
there's also the subterfuge of
the media-propaganda complex:
nothing new: last time i heard
i heard: zilch and then an itch
and i was spooked by how limitless
not being paranoid can make
you gravitating toward a second
layer of consciousness:
it's not like there aren't smart individuals
out there:
but even geniuses behave like
idiots in a chess game that's not
a chess game that's cattle herding
or rather: not even cattle: or
herding: just biological traffic...
and you don't really see biological
traffic in the animal kingdom
but in humans: at events:
just your yawn every day...
god she sounds so ****:
oh but you hurt my feelings...
no...
i just gave you negative feelings:
which is much better than
not giving you feelings:
i didn't hurt your feelings:
i just gave you negative feelings...
neurotic woman
psychotic man...
you decipher the words and
conjure up a picture...
but it's true: Lucy Letby and the whole
hero-complex:
more verbiage...
that's the western post-colonial mentality...
so the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq
were fair play
the war between the Israelites and
the Palestinians: fair play...
every ******* color of the flags waved...
but, somehow? Russia oh so bad?
i've visited Russia:
RUSKIE SKURVYSYNY:
so? at least i'll drink a beer
and eat dehydrated shrimps with them
thinking it's not Thailand and not
peanuts...
just by alienating the one people
that might have the misfortune of
keeping Christianity alive:
and you're telling me:
some advantageous lie some bogus
BIG STINK like it's the BIG BANG
and a NEW THINK is going
to: ******* help me?!
who you associate with
is who you become:
i never thought that being had
a trajectory, i.e. of becoming:
but being and becoming
is something that was not written
about in the 20th century by
either Sartre or Heidegger...
being dissociated from becoming
is the schematized man
of being and time and being and nothingness:
what is time and nothingness
when being comes: so finitely
and implores: so what of becoming?
i hate the 20th century schematized man
with "his"... (shh... more a case
of its make-up) Freudian secular trinity
of ego superego id...
that's fertile ground for conflating
the importance of pronouns:
but the it pronoun is a she that's a he
so your ******* noun of a name
i ask if Peter is coming for supper
implies that a ******* Susan turns up?!
a denial of: a Peter she: is a Susan he:
but a she Peter is still a Peter:
no good abstracting the Peter that's
still a male given name
when you say she: but still say
the already gender neutral pronoun
of the life-affirming: aye: i...
so...
   what's up with this custard pie of language...
and no wonder the Russians and the Chinese
are not invading:
too many idiots, spastic fantastic
******* jugabaloos... wondering:
um um: spaghetti sputniks?!
would it matter where i double up on the consonant
in jugabaloos:
is that better as juggabaloos
or better as jugabbaloos?!
Mateuš Conrad
Written by
Mateuš Conrad  36/M/Essex (England)
(36/M/Essex (England))   
46
 
Please log in to view and add comments on poems