.murky are the forces, behind man's origins of intent, what freedom to succumb to a will, when the contradiction is in plain sight... the contradiction of competing wills, what inverted revision of the iron curtain must become apparent... man's inherent "concern" for free will, is nothing but the inherent desire to express it, by trampling on the "free will" of others... and then, the bonding servitude on the platitudes of concepts, akin to power, if not a slave unto a man, a slave unto an idea, a phantom man, a tier higher... and then unto the gods, who were never such a bothersome invention, as being invented to strive... but then the tier below, the phantom man, the crux of thinking, not of will unto the gods... the phantom man of: when thinking itself, because a claustrophobia... origins, intent, hierarchy... have only the jews ever liberated themselves from both the physical reality of the pyramid, and the metaphysical realism of the pyramid's shadow... how feeble, in man's attempt: to conquer mountain, given his predicament, of the scarcity allowance of his own time.
the samsung "collusion", wow, a big boys' word,
well it must be...
perfect song
to listen to, while writing
something akin
to this?
ex_machina soundtrack,
song?
hacking / cutting...
do i own a samsung tablet,
yes?
what do i use it for...
the simple convenience...
of being perched on
a windowsill,
drinking, smoking a cagerette
out of the window...
into the night...
"star gazing"...
is it a luxury?
what, for mostly listening to music
videos on youtube,
given that by the time i finish
writing this,
there will only be about 2 physical
music outlets in London
(i.e. shops, i just mean shops)...
where you travel, mingle with people...
how many ******* shoes
or mobile phones do i need?
the number of vinyl records
i might "need"
are akin to the old autobahn
speed-limits...
they're: inexhaustible...
it's just a ******* samsung tablet
from god knows when...
but samsung, i'm sorry to say,
has been calluding with
the powers at be
in terms of youtube video
commentaries...
first i thought it was a viewing
count...
watched a 300+ video commentary,
watched a 30,000+ video commentary...
same ****, no different cover...
then watched a music video,
which wasn't exactly a music video,
since, i don't really like: music videos...
just a static screen,
with an album cover...
you know... when you listen
to radio, broadcast on the internet,
and the screen flashes up,
dims the lighting,
then switches off...
but the audio continues?
see... i have a problem...
with samsung tablets...
these commentary
videos...
"controversial"...
i have to repeat the action
of touching the screen,
which i'm not exactly looking at...
mind elsewhere: ears honing in...
it's not like these youtubers
are working the radio over the internet
broadcast system...
once the samsung tablet's
light turn on,
dim down,
then turn off completely...
the audio cuts off...
but not, unless...
you're listening to a song,
whether a real video fetish fest,
or a static screen of an album cover...
it's no "big" thing...
it's not like this tablet is anything
than an utility tool for
the new form of walkman,
a portable c.d. player,
an mp3 player...
because... that's primarily what
it is to me...
10 minute interludes
on the windowsill,
cigarette in tow,
"star-gazing" or whatever
you want to call: "introspection"...
but music videos on youtube
do not put the device into
a "sleep-mode"...
or at least...
not in the mode associate
primarily with listening to
radio stations working
their way past the device of
radio, to compensate their
transmission focus...
how can you listen
to a commentary video,
on a device...
that deems the video...
well: "null"?
the device is about 10 years old,
but somehow,
it has been updated...
to convey the current political
climate...
music videos are fine...
the device doesn't go
into "sleep mode",
any current social commentary
and the device does its prime duty,
bright lights of the screen,
dimmed lights of the screen,
snooze.
prop machine, say are you,
say i, say we are non you,
say i,
and then come to the synthetic
conclusion...
that other a.i. -
artifice intelligence,
which is what intelligence was
to begin with.
ever talk to siri
on twitter...
i once did... apparently
"she" sent out a barage of messages to
slow down... or calm down...
or whatever made the "news"
of this niche segment of society.
isn't that what the artificiality of
intelligence actually is, and is supposed to be?
i.e. artifice?
aren't we supposed to be crafting
something as intelligent as ourselves,
in order to fool ourselves
within the confines of its over-invested
capacity?
artificial intelligence is vague...
as a term, a concept, an ideology...
a thorough-running thought project...
i know that intelligence reflects
such associate elements as: trust...
to be trust-worthy...
but the sort of
intelligence invested, into creating,
"intelligence"... something inherited...
nuanced...
it's not artificial...
artificial as in: just because a lot of
nerds congregated and thought smart
in unison...
a lot of passionate
people also congregated at one point,
and: gas, gas the... ...chambers.
only a simple example of how a.i. behaves...
it mimics savoured criticism
of the cul de sac,
a commentary video
akin to sargon of akkad
will do just that, when transmitted
on a samsung device...
but a music video won't:
(a) lights are on
(b) lights dim
(c) the device "switches off"...
(sub-c) the device continues
its transmission, with a radio station
translated into a post-radio device
"phantom"...
i stopped calling it artificial
intelligence after a while...
it's artifice...
as blatant as c.g.i.
graphics...
if there was an iron curtain...
another curtain has come in its place.