oh, well, it takes roughly
staying up to 1am
to listen to foxes...
maul through their desperate cries
of existence...
the persistent reiteration of
linguistics,
the overt-subject matter of *** -
can the tongue please find the mouth,
then the head,
then the brain, then the mind,
then the substance of soul,
and move away from
the genital preoccupation...
i know some gentiles have been
circumcised in the wild wild west...
but... please...
well: evidently this is a counter...
infringing on the freedoms of
others, is to somehow: feed
the inhibitions,
of my already inhibited freedoms
that others share?
rigidity,
that's what i've ever experienced...
language this,
language that,
genesis primordial english,
erasure,
like some sort of lapse,
amnesia,
remains?
a nodding approval...
or the leprosy haven...
more concerned with
a testimony of telling a bad joke,
than resentment...
base fact:
i want to capture language in
the anti-voyeuristic sense of transit...
it's not a people,
it's not a place,
english, is... very much a lingua franca...
a means of transaction...
a language of tourists...
that's it...
which is why i feel sorry
for the natives...
caught-up in this whole h'american
"debacle"...
concerning the integration
of immigrants / ex-pats for the "in crowd"...
so you want me to speak
the language, but you want me to speak it,
you want me to speak it,
but you don't want me to keep
my diacritical "bias",
entertain your lack of,
you know...
playing with a Ken & Barbie
would be much simpler...
you want me to speak english
without minding accent...
but then miding an accent,
you want me to make diacritical distinctions,
but not make them...
you want me to mind
"orthography", when "you",
"yourself" don't have any...
apart from dyslexia...
the ****?!
you: pronouns
+r: determiner
self: noun...
ego: noun...
the english language,
the mongrel that it is,
it sure as **** dictates
itself rightly as a lingua franca,
the language of tourists...
but is it a universal *******
arbiter?
"gender neutral" pronouns...
then they're not pronouns
to begin with! are they?
you think that resurfacing from
under the eisenvorhang...
at least back then
back in 1986...
the soviets had power...
what is this...
a revisionism
of the english language?
****... if you're going to play
the "gender neutrality" card,
might as well play
the "plural inclusivity" card,
given how some
schizophrenics might settle
the debate with: WE...
confusing, i know,
but given their hallucinatory
symptoms...
we as i,
i as we,
i wasn't even born in england,
and i'm supposed to be, inclined,
to have a share,
in this country's, "inheritance"?
so i'm supposed to
**** off h'america?
because of the shared
allegiance of the shared tongue?
ha ha...
rewriting the strict
obligations to grammar,
as necessary refinement to
approach communicated speech...
so no meow,
no blah blah,
no growl will do?
please bring back the soviet
intellectuals,
the whole world is laughing...
i'm laughing...
i'm laughing in a hysterical
venture of...
minding "the" fact that...
there's a madman,
and he sounds more sane
than some of these counterfeit
sanity respondents...
**** it...
this whole circus of en masse...
as nietzsche pointed out,
is the oll-neu-norm...
bettering the cause...
what the hell is "bettering"
and what the hell is, "the cause"?
by now...
people are not even bothering
to reference the dictionary...
we're talking about only
sourcing the application
of the thesaurus...
cue misnomer,
cue the interpolation
of the general standard of meaning...
wrap up a **** in
the flag of conveyance
and call it: choccy thursdays.