all in all: there is no grand NO counter existence... that noumenon-pandora of the "self"-in-itself: reflexive that's never reflective: continues...
as long as the pleasures are attainable, and cheap...
me? i have no grand NO contra existence: itself, no:
non per se se per "non" (ex-)
(not in itself, itself in "no" (out of) - and hence the missing outlet source)...
i do have a grand NO... but my "grand" NO is not on the grounds of existence...
mine? zoo...
i say my grand NO on the grounds of ontology... and not on the grounds of existence...
ontology has no per se "annex" / foundation to be rebelled against: to counter...
existence on the other hand? beyond the "self" there's a self to be minded...
i cannot say a grand NO against existence: i am dodo: i am to be replaced...
i say my "grand" NO against ontology... on-to-and-thoroughly-with the logistics of: reciprocated devaluation...
i have a, NO... but it's not a existential no... nor Fwench... did you know: the French used to trill before they succumbed to harking the rho?
vita est pro vita vel: in vitro...
i have a, NO... Pontius Pilate said: and life beside before and after me: will continue... but am i to behave by the common will of the collectivist demand?
i have no grand negation of the most grand per se... but i have a need to nibble on the branch: i say NO to the ontology and... a shy yES to the existence...
i: fraction common of the grey mass of the street's traffic of pedestrians; and... that... is... all i will ever fathom... in... allowing... myself... to... give... freely.