you could have had your dumb-struck
******, watching lightning flash
while subsequently not hearing any thunder...
your little kid your little
custard thought ascription of a mind
with any subscription to think...
but you attacked grammar...
you attacked grammar...
           looking at the French zunge,
i realized...
wait  minute...
            how can you expect to
instigate a gender neutrality of pronouns,
when you, CAN'T bypass
the pluralism neutrality of the same
category of words?!
what, am, i, missing?!
     the ****?!
  gender neutral...
who needs to stress an ambiguity case?
no one!
         just because your noun
categorization if not gender orientated,
just because your language doesn't
entertain the concept of gender, verbum-per-se...
like... English, as a language,
doesn't identify the posit
to make the Sun (female noun),
and Moon (male noun)...
well... sorry... stop backtracking the rest of us!
******* crutches...
backstabbers... deadweight...
i'm not paying for your
grammatical, "reevaluation" *******...
sorry... no...
        i'll burn for this statement
if i have to...
and i'll burn burn burn:
the roof, the roof, the roof is on fire...
laughing!
   you could have sided with me...
sided with me on the obscurity of
applied linguistics...
but then you attacked applied
linguistics...
              how can these people even
consider the "thought" of
getting away with transcending
grammar?
               you can transcend whaatever
the hell you want,
but you can't transcend
a + b + b + a = ABBA...
            you can radiohead
that ****, fist-ing the ****-**** out
of someone... but:
2 x 2 ≠ 5..
   or whether it's 2 + 2...

no... i would have let the whole affair
go... like i might watch a bunch
of birds at sunrise...
but no... now?
having attacked grammar?

grammar is dogma to me,
grammar is the tier above
what exists as
Greek orthodox Christianity,
or Russian orthodox Christianity...
or Roxette being above
Abba:
    ****... pop music is
a virus, it's supposed to be
infectious, i listened to one direction...
and i'm not
siusiumajtki (****-pants) teenage
girls...
  it's like that known
fetish for classical music composers...

gender neutral pronouns...
*******...
how about a plural neutrality
of pronouns?
the gender neutral pronoun
crowd "think" that:
that they thee are...
somehow singular,
and now... plural...

it's *******! esp. when it comes from
within the confines of a language
that hasn't the decency to,
at least, at least,
make the added effort of diacritical
application!

whatever...
i'm not compelled to speak either,
my, speech,
is contained within
the confines of the comment section...
but on the readily
available blank pixel
piece of, "paper"?

what's wrong with, thinking?!
i settled my res extensa
morality of, a hidden, "ought";
i exercise a freedom of thought,
because i have settled
my affair with thought
as an extension of the, moral, ought;

so yes, attack me...
but on the basis of the comment sections...
this, this material?
hell... teach Picasso
to unlearn the cube,
the unraveling of a cube,
the canvas, the paintbrush,
color, and painting oils...
**** it, let's edge a bit closer...
teach a Picasso to unlearn
the existence of the possession of hands.