i never appreciating the Greeks laundering the Hebrew texts bound to the New Testament... then somehow, "magically" fusing it as a pre-scriptum of the Old Testament... the savagery of a simple theft... not plagiarism... theft... μία παίζω επί τέσσερα - mia paizoo epi tessera - a play on four... i never (up to a certain time) liked the idea of the Greeks sacking Judea, for reasons akin to why the Venetians sacked Constantinople... third? or fourth Crusade? when they brought back the famous horses that adorn the St. Mark's basilica of Venice... you can almost say: the ancient Greek pride... contra the myth of Rome being founded by Trojans kicked in... so they used the weakest social minority to their advantage, the Hebrews... esp. the Hebrew writing... the crucifix came in handy - μία παίζω επί τέσσερα mia paizoo epi tessera...
mainstream ******* about the Dead Sea Scrolls: listen... that has monumental interest for the Hebrews... notably surrounding the death of the prophet Isaiah... disemboweled, cut in half, whatever...
the Dead Sea Scrolls are... pointless? the Nag Hammadi library... St. Thomas' Gospel... oh look... found by a shepherd in Egypt... and the flight of Joseph Mary & Jesus... it took place: to where? hmm...
don't even get me started on the archeological correlation with accounts of the days, written at the time of Nero by a Josephus ben Matthias...
which would also correlate with: the book of Revelation would have to have been written first, as contra-propaganda against Nero... an instigator gospel... and then the blatant geometric abuse of the tetragrammaton began...
as someone who attended a catholic school... i can tell you that the Arabs were influenced by Greek gnostics - the gnostics traveled to Arabia... heretic...
but i can't remember which of the four gospels are similar... ah... Matthew, Luke & Mark - there's your trinity - but what about John? point being: how would a Greek translate or encrypt YHWH (ha shem) into the whole affair?
who is H no. 1 and who is H no. 2? so which of the synoptic gospels are the most similar...
suppose John is an outright outlier, and can be considered yod (Y) -
Mark - 3% unique, 94% similarity to Matthew (i.e. 94% of Mark is Matthew), 42% similarity to Luke (i.e. 42% of Luke is Mark) Matthew - 20% unique, 55% similarity to Mark (i.e. 55% of Mark is Matthew), 64% similarity to Luke (i.e. 64% of Matthew is Luke) Luke - 35% unique, 79% similarity to Mark (i.e. 79% of Mark is Luke), 70% similar to Matthew (i.e. 70% of Luke is Matthew)...
whatever the arrangement, where 79% of Mark is Luke, or whether it's 79% of Luke is Mark... Mark, with 3% uniqueness is a plagiarist... John's not in it...
point being...
given the concept: μία παίζω επί τέσσερα - a play on four... at least i know which two evangelists fit the bill of
י ה ✝ ה
ו
Matthew and Luke are the most similar... not with the archeological finding, not with the contemporary account by a Hebrew historian Josephus ben Matthias.... not with primitively hushed propaganda memes against the emperor Nero...
everyone i know who's Irish always said: Christianity undermined the Roman Empire... and why would the Byzantines flourish for so long, and endure, past the collapse of the Western Empire... "miraculously"?
sorry... can't buy this **** any longer... if i'm going to have to pound against the doors of the church like a crazed ram... i will... i am done... buying this Greek *******!