the English "philosophical" mentality: does everything have to be hyper-economized stature? i do appreciate the technicality of the term... but the supposed practicality of the impracticality of practicing philosophy doesn't belong here; philosophy doesn't require, or rather, make a request for the usage or the English per se... and never will... the English never made the thinking surmount of thinking per per... as ever... the buggers were always too practical.... and their access to practicality... was their access to.... a labor of lust, which surmounted in both a labor lost, and lust misguided: come the folded sails.