unlike with the Hippocratic oath - or what medicine gets up to - a noun is a noun - a verb is a verb - and that's it!
but jurisprudence? the study of law? red can "imply" crimson - yellow can "imply" canary - the overridden "nuance" -
when it comes to the "study" of law - the goal posts keep moving, like a mirage, and only like a mirage...
oculus per oculus: eye for an eye doesn't apply... why? a life is worth more when exacting the Libra standard - the rest is sadism... or exfoliates in sadism -
it's one thing to spew ill of the dead, but another thing to not justify the original violence - i'm not a sadist... God wasn't either... either man and the electric chair, or God... the arctic tundra of Siberia... roam... be free...
what's wrong with exchanging capital punishment with the Biblical stance of leaving someone in some lack of civilization hellhole of Siberia?
just like my grandfather said, the one who cried his schoolboy eyes' out when Stalin died, and tried to trim it to an aunt, but on rehearing the incident in his dementia - actually attributed the event to himself...
a Georgian, subverting the Russians... **** me... an Austrian subverting the Germans?!
at least medicine makes progress, and never regresses into a "nostalgia"... albeit there are some corrupt individuals... but the study of law? whenever is makes progress - is regresses... bundling in the thesaurus exploitation of language...
the study of jurisprudence is akin to the myth of Sisyphus... the rock keeps rolling down that hill of supposed improvement... jurisprudence is nostalgia... past laws are not improved, they are modified...
that's why amendments exist... whenever clauses are past... i've learned enough of law to listen to its lawlessness -
at least with medicine you can expect progress - within the confines of the confiture of law? regress - the stiffening of having to resemble and receive a "wisdom" from the past...
it's like... there was never any originality to begin with!
i have two arguments for the "existence" of god... namely the up-kept existence of such "laws":
1. welshmen are prohibited from entering Chester before the sun rises - and have to leave again before the sun goes down
2. it is legally sound to shoot a welshman on a sunday inside the city walls - as long as it’s after midnight and with a crossbow;
and there are people who find folklore superstitions funny... awkward... debasing, silly...
how about the stated laws? to be honest, the folklore superstitions? daemons and what not? seem quiet reasonable... given that what people believe is less unreasonable, compared to what people pass as law, and subsequently pass off as, "law";
i know the heart is irrational... but a mind that makes such *******? sorry... i'd prefer the lunatic heart over a brain that passes such judgements.