Morality flows between the cracks stays the hand from evil acts consider how this comes to be from dogma’s fear or something else the former seems to be true though one may ask what promotes adherence to a greater good when the latter also kind
please don’t **** just anyone taking blood to cure pure lust with a lack of deity some would seek a ****** spree this is fated, some would say no boundaries set by fear embraced the punitive is all that holds strong malice from the human heart
this ascends the iceberg’s tip so many more sins now await no longer held by a dread of what may happen when we’re dead perhaps you spot a flaw in this that some people can resist running wild with no regard even if they have no god
those other sins may intrude the ones that are identity not immoral when affirmed outside the boundaries of a book commandments laid at our feet demanding more than few can meet some restricted to belief the others shared by decent men
more than worry of the law instead a sense of what is right sprung from souls that conspire to steer their life between the lines empathy becomes the tool a golden rule to guide the fool to conclusions that serve all morality to fill a life.
The poem “Between the Lines” is a poetic consideration about religion being the only source of morality. There is consideration that “true” atheists have no morals and are basically rudderless ships void of ethical direction. While I don’t claim to be atheist, the ones that I’m aware of are perfectly capable of leading ethical lives. Meanwhile, atrocities are carried out by those with motivations, and while a religion may temper the outcome, it does not guarantee that harm will not befall others.