/                     what's the difference between
the modern, h'american
   utility of the
                   acronym,
    and the old,
   who-you-pinning
   take on latinabbreviation?
not much...
       or nothing, at all...
but the who-rope-pinning
extract is...
  more...
       secluded...
an exclusive ideology...
rather than the inclusive
ideology remark of the:
are you in on this?
  are you in on this?
  are you in on this?
the americana:
bite the hand that feeds you
mentality...
   i'd prefer latin abbreviations
to modern, american
acronyms, which resonates
in my head, as, simply:
U!                 S!                  A!
   - the only reason latin "ist tod"
is because of it being abbreviated,
away from what the actual grammatical
structure would look like,
when spoken to an ancient...
   it's latin, in stenographic form...
cogito ergo sum is
actually a stenographic form
of expression,
   given there's also an ego,
to format the expression...
latin est non mort:
    why?  est in stenographica...
.zip file, compressed...
    did people actually think they'd
get that **** past me,
on a congested public transport,
and that i wouldn't notice?!
******* h'american inclusion
acronyms: just like the name of their
country... a ******* acronym...
and the ******* mantra
are you in on this?
   are you in on this?
        are you in on this?
thanks for the **** inclusion inquiry
posit...
    now turn around...
and ******* to california!