/                       the overarching principle of tao:
which is not even a maxim
to investigate -
  unlike scientific truths and
propositions -
    philosophical maxims?
are they presuppositions,
or mere suppositions?
       presuppositions you have
to attest to, finding out -
not some *****-nilly half baked
croissants...
nonetheless... it all balances
out, as the world always does:
begining with the tao principle -
the only way to aid the world
is to forget the world,
and allow the world to forget you...

why was ezra pound an anti-taoist?
well...
    thankfully we can all see
the mastering of zen by the americans.

"schools" of thought do not exist
in state insitutions...
       fwee wack a birweedee!
   like, like, i mean like: free like a bird...
silicon valley is decrepit zen...
motorcycles and ****, and fixing them...

why was ezra pound so anti the principle
of ταo?
    missing diacritical marks?
(i.e. punctuation marks within a word?)
if he'd wake up and
spot the ζεν (or ζην if you're sharp, crisp:
samurai movie pronunciation tactic type)...

if china holds a grip of hollywood,
as the americana "conspiracy theorists"
believe...
        dig deeper...

       ζεν contra ταo...
                         i'm what ezra pound would
hate... as the 20th century came to a close,
ταo was out, ζεν was in...
   maybe that's the problem...

teacher?
    got kicked in the ***** by one
of his disciples, and he said very little
to begin with...
                 so he was a ****** teacher
to begin with,
given his disciple kicked me in the *****...
now my turn...

       i already presumed you
                        have no testicles... so why
bother doing anything with you,
other than allowing you a rigid gluttony
super-structure that becomes a sumo (wrestler)?

honest to god:
   that's a heidegger primo value
elevation...
     because this question?
               is question-worthy, since it is
a momentum.