a youtube page of "instant gratification"... "up-to-speed"
connection expectation
...(diesel car engines have to run on stand-still for a while, as any scottfish roofer will tell you at 5am in the morning... give it 30 minutes... the giraffe should turn into gazelle... any minute now)...
pixel-white interaction...
given the fact that samsung has demonetißed all of american content creators:
using a samsung tablet? i haven't seen a single advert in probably two years...
not, one!
(not a single video on youtube is allowed advert streaming when utilißed via a samsung outlet device)...
it's like a free pass into the red light district of amsterdam! no nonsense policy pass into "deviation":
do men still travel to amsterdam to experience the legality of marijuana? seriously?
so not the prozzies?
the same mad american was working the newly arrived tourists on the streets, supposing it was like visiting detroit: and the night customers were not akin to the sudanese starving masses... can't remember his name... he did say it...
but ended up speaking with a spaghetti tangled tongue and i'm half trying... and half...
i can see his face...
it's neither pretty, nor ugly, just memorable... i don't even think he was out to squash a con to fit into his pocket, and lace it with pennies...
could i really be that bad, to go to amsterdam, spend three days among the sensible dutch, and not go there to enjoy their lax laws convened around marijuana use, but instead, go to amsterdam to **** a plump puerto rican with an african pageboy who was supposed to bring extra heinekens to her neon tower, of a cermic tiled boudoir?
**** me! if that isn't amsterdam?! and the sensible dutch? no wonder the english think that peasants shouldn't even allow themselves the relenting ) outside the bracket joy of ****-a-billy-billy... ***!
too much "excuse" from being ashamed of 1960s' ***-infused humour, i guess to aspire an argument for suggesting an exposure.
england is experiencing a... hmm: misnomer at every turn... A 1960s SHAME OF MAKING *** FUNNY...
apparently i'm not surprised... because if *** isn't niqqab serious in how two bodies attach themselves for a brief moment? then there's no a priori to begin with.