/secularism can't be anything new
compared with the monotheistic
    quest to convert paganism:
           same ****, different cover,
                     aim high: look down below...

coming from a shady sheikh with
oil reserves...
           the **** am i supposed to feed
the deisel engine? salt?!

      nice...             nice...

  kept me quiet with cotton-candy?!
******.

   i alrteady mentioned the transformation
of: psychiatrist is the new priest,
eucharist via the funny pills on your
way out...
      i'm not rich enough to buy: talk,
with a psychologist,
   sorry, i'm sure an oops is aligned
with this statement;
although i'd rather not, sell, or
                                                        buy it.

imagine: a body, worth a spa.

          that's how i see, the, "other",
             ah... you know...
         the usual gatsby paupers...
               hardly the scuttling rat solipsist
donning a chance to game: hide,
     and subsequently seek...

half baked irony... those sort of people...
      ladder-step-counters,
   chandelier mishandlers,
            they come,
   the supposed-party,
                                            dries­ out.

dentists and radiologists faking
dr. entitlements,
      relieving the surgeons,
                       a mr. butcher status...
good to know how all people
are made manifest, in being humbled...

apparently there might be a problem
with my identifying as a whole
upon, the "concept" of west slavic...

          not even a history but rather
a perpetuated nostalgia...
             not even the communists would
have conjured up: bleaching people,
esp. when not guaranteeing them
a grammar, basis,
            namely: that thing you do not
deem to be allowed change...

      so... pronouns are suddenly
trans-grammatical?
      i was actually hoping to branch out
into an antithesis of metaphysics...
thank god we already possess
orthography, to clock into the benzene
ring allocation process...

as far as i am concerned,
i only picked up the english language,
when it began to disintegrate
into: less an accuracy of day-to-day usage,
and more into:
       god forbid this be a philosophical
circumstance...
         i can't even posit a circa!

so:
    in the thinking concerning meta-,
and of the ortho-,
       and of the trans- (populism)...
should ask me about the trivialities of
genuine concerns,
             about the asylum post-scriptum,
and how: the wrong madmen are
running the show, high on unearthing
st. thomas' gospel...

                apparently the sentiment
        relies on: -1 + 1 = 2 dynamic:
because linear mathematics is never about
coordination, nor was puritan arithmetic
about: anything other than fudge
                                                  and beavers...

i just learned the ****** language!
****!
         do these natives have to make-up
these artificial difficulties,
    this: transcendence of grammar?
                can we allow but one constant?!

we can reverse the "popular" movement
by approx.,
    namely returning to the crude,
"deaf": encoding procedures...

      ~theta:
                                   v'eh point,
i.e. the-

                   more or less: ~F elsewhere...

also neither acidic or alkaline,
   given:  φilosoφy...

           as ever... insert a key into
a lock: φ...

                                  turn & enter: θ.

so H is either a vowel-catcher,
         or it's an impetus for:
chitty-chitty-bang-bang...
                            consonant-­morph...

     ~600+ years or so, later, Islam deems
                 secularism as the new paganism...
i would have believed the: blank slate
argument,
         only if grammatical rules were
kept intact...
           but since the communists are dead,
and the chinese only pretended...
  i'm guessing boredom,
         or rather:
              a disorientating narrative
of a profession allowed this to take place
in "consensus" establishment...

           i've just acquired this lingua,
i'd have more sense in respecting it,
   than abusing it, disintegrating it,
               "unlearning" grammar that i haven't
properly "learned"...
          hence my suggestion:
                        teaching a counter-innate?!

you can't exactly teach a counter-innate
fathomability of a language...

   playing god among atoms is
one thing...
               but playing "god" among words?

you can spot the idiocy of
                    a Pilate-esque "voyeurism"...

     this is a public medium!
           yes yes, i have my idiosyncracies
to mind, which implies that
           there is no agreed upon: consensus...

hardly a chance to mind deconstructionism
within a grammatical paradigm;
better mind the non-existence of
the concept of orthography in the english
tongue...
              or perhaps this be the tongue
of a people, too preoccupied with
metaphysics,
       given their lack of conceptualißing
diacritical marks,
       via and toward an orthography rubric...

a second tier of mannerism, eh?