the medical profession has the same dichotomy problem, but it's much simpler than you think, notably due to the anglo-saxon approach: innocent, before proven guilty - well, isn't that merely a summary of the casual phrase: the benefit of the doubt?
currently the medical profession is marxist, in the sense that: every ailment is material... there is no register of a higher tier of ailment in terms of mentality... which is hardly a mensa project to digest logic scores of "problems"...
be warned: even if there are no immediate problems, man will conjure problems on a mere whim, for man is invested in conjuring problems, even if there are none apparent, notably via bureaucracy... after all, self-worth has to be found among tapeworms, and leeches.
yet the medical profession still finds it hard to move beyond puritanical materialism, of marxism, or as i once stated: good luck staring at a brick wall and leaving the painter hungry with no sketch of his to adore your living room wall... chess, anyone?
because on the continent, away from these ****** island dwellers... you find mole mounds in urban scenarios... but you also find the flip-side of jurisprudence: guilty, until proven innocent... which equates to a Shawshank scenario... locked up for 18 years for a crime he didn't commit... which in casual phrasing is, what? the benefit of the denial? don't ask me why that sounds appropriate with the definite articles...
hmm... #metoo etc. seems to be a copernican inversion of a flat earth, in misappropriated terminology worth a description of the current state of affairs in the practice of jurisprudence...
... if ever a philosopher challenged jurisprudence and moved away from ethics... perhaps dabbled in aesthetics... but down to the nitty-gritty... incy-whincy spider... fascinating bugs... esp. when observed threading the architectural strong posit of the web... seemingly gliding from one corner to another, accelerated by nothing other than pure adrenaline... and with one touch on the bulging pouch of exoskeleton: scuttling away into shadow.
medicine as such is marxist in that it's purely material... hyper-materialism is probably a good label to tame... but there is a hypo-materialism in medicine... it's what i call the secular priesthood, namely the psychologist, and the pharma-butchers that are psychiatrists...
people could begin telling their children: welcome, to the ****-show.