Hostages are held on each side soldiers counted for the cause weaponized for the greater good now put forward to crush the curs no hold barred by high decree the scorched earth is the outcome achievements mean more than men blood enriches the thirsty soil.
Families become war's fodder friends asundered to ensure all that matters is consequence right by might is assured with the chains of dogma's curse exacting conduct from the folk the end times are at least realized once again for the thousandth’s time.
Total victory eludes the chief wanting more than statements grind give and take is anathema when sacred tasks are near at hand no matter that the benefactors supreme junta of hallowed ways desiring outcomes born of death are the fraction of army's size.
No prisoners is the leader's chant ignorant of the followers who seek a path that deviates from the holy handed down guidance is the vicar's goal lest the lambs wander far they know the slaughter promises shepherd's pie in victory.
I came across a friend’s post about the ability to exist between antagonistic polarities. This seems contrary to the “winner take all” nature of many societal conflicts. Desired outcomes are stated in black and white. No deviations are possible. This may work for the leaders, those who are called upon to maintain a cause’s forward momentum, but it can be incredibly destructive for those outside this hallowed bubble. “Shepard’s Pie” is about this dichotomy.