herr fitzgerald and st. augustine's ethos of education - a primary in Barkingside, close enough to the Gants Hill roundabout: an infamous thrill for a cyclist to merge with heavy traffic... nonetheless, so a boy picks up pictures of Pamela Anderson from a cornershop (which isn't on a corner) - for free - and distributes a few in the playground - gets ratted out after a sloppy attempt to another boy who never managed to ******* to bronzino's venus, cupid, folly, and time... which ends up being a double standard on the western niqab: or sun-glasses, or is venus & cupid a better cipher than madonna and the child? what would castrated piglets knows? - all i have to point to is: do you "teach" the boy (regarding the Pamela Anderson soft core nudes) lesson (a) what would you say, if that was your mother?! or lesson (b) what would you say, if that was your daughter? lesson (a) actually happened... but where's the ******? the motivation? thank you herr fitzgerald for this worthwhile lesson, and i really have to thank for all the psychiatric regression implants insinuating some sort of *******... quasi-sympathy... as ever, psychiatry, the cheapest form of acting... came the elephant, and you know what the elephant is good at? ganesha, the patron "saint" of alzheimer... you sheer, or sneer? my, the mighty addition of a letter, suddenly the world turns up-side down, or receives a copernican rotation... point being: how can you curb pornographic excesses when you having done it over a fine art piece? to later resort to: no third parties welcome bridge: is that a winking game? it's still a question, do you conceive passing morality by asking the question: (a) your mother?! or (b) your daughter? hello once again, on the chicken prior to the egg or the reverse carousel... whatever that might be: i'm pretty sure that the umbilical mouth came before the mandible jaw, which came after the pucker pooch, which eventually became an ****.