i can't believe a man can be intelligent, or a woman can be beautiful... i believe the two enter a harmony, of just plain difficulty; if only carrying pebbles was as difficult as climbing a mountain.
the subjectivity / objectivity "muddle", or rather the proximity of words sharing a "neat" contort similis... how similar are these two words to allow a space-time continuum? based upon a prefix with the remaining harmony of spelling... a "muddle" of congregating upon the basis of: *interjection... but i have to borrow from another language the antithesis nouns and say... temat (subject) via rzecz (thing)... or if you prefer in german... gegenstand... huh... gegen i.e. against: standing... as if there's an immediacy to be attached to turning an inanimate thing into a verb that becomes res extensa... radical dualism can't be met with radical monism in the observation of the autism of petted felines, or the honing "device" of hawks? i appreciate that some writers require their mundane narrative the use of a thesaurus... you can see it... the dull lines with the odd extremity of a borrowed word plucked from a peacock's tail... what is the kantian categorical impetus? probably a study of grammar... after all... there's a noun category, and there's a verb category... and there's the adjective- that compensates for sheering or sharpening knives. my... english and the surds: (g)nome and (k)nives... i will never get over the fact that it's a form-proximity ******* (draw a square, and then a rhombus) while excluding the accent prefixes of -ject -ject (sub-) (ob-)... it has to be a form of abstracted claustrophobia being argued... am i wrong in stating that current darwinism is much less biology, and more zoology in terms of writing "a" history? i can compensate feeling good about myself having decided: what's the difference between marxism and darwinism? don't know: ask **** similis who forgot the sapiens.