what's the latin intermediate word to conjugate space & time, that isn't ergo in the compound space-time, i.e. what word could be ascribed to replace the hyphen conjugation? or rather, what can unravel the cogito ergo sum, with a missing ergo... that, even if missing, precipitates into a manifestation to ground in an exempli gratia... or when are a company's obligation to make travel expenses not worth a denote- of being named gratis? notably in the tax rubric expected from them as: "cost free"?

    are ideas: moral prompts?
             or (are they) just the grey area of
   entertainment?
                    XY chromosome
interpretation of the two
               essences: time-space...
worse than moral relativists
are the ones scolding
the existence of subjectivity,
any drunk would say:
   puritanical physics -
   object "contra" object...
     but of the content necessary
for the inherent, i.e.
  "the" inertia?
    darwinism and the rite
of history... against and again
   the point of a village...
language: play-dough...
       but at least
there's not desentizing effect
manifested in "a" utility...
          was there really a question
manifested in *a competence
of use?
      apparently one cannot
juggle time: as a subject
                 rather than an object
as one cannot juggle space:
as an object rather than a subject...
   vice versus crucified on
St. Andrew's crux...
                 yet there's a brooding
abhorance to comment on...
      the exclusiveness of objectivity...
unfathomable
       to even begin "hiding"
            behind a crux ex cura...
         is time a posit to discuss
an exhort of context, or to make content?
   to ask with the same
                 "encouragement"
   (misnomer, the antithesis of
a thesaurus, naked in "air quotes")
    regarding space?
             a mark of the collective
is a mark of puritanical physics...
       as if a semblence with
object-object interaction
           was the zenith,
                    that a subject-object
    interaction didn't exist,
like the symbol of crown and a coin
effigy embedded, or the status of
a king...
              of course a critique of
subjectivity is demanded,
      but that a subject-subject
     parallelism is not expected
     with a compensation of an object per se?
denote-?
               id est: denotion.
i'm still bewildered by the negative
approach to subjectivity,
   as if "boredom" and the
"missing space" / the immediately
apparent was such a negative
                                     "status" posit...
if you ever walked the
labyrinth of english suburbia
you'd know what i mean:
      the gagging for a mirror labyrinth.
- because how can i make
language become a
            mathematic-cipher replica
"translation": and
   ask a matter of a conductor
reading music while "dancing"
   like a: newly liberated
                                  epileptic?

p.s. can you be truly objective about
both time, and space?
     aren't we immediately "forced"
into the inherent subjective ontology
of memory?
                        i am: nostalgia
is hardly a case for adhering
           to a "sensibility" of objectivity.