why psychological studies are a load of *******; the "near" assurance of the non-existence of god, the almighty mechanisation of man in the mind of man, with the study of a soul, as the extension toward god, and made into an extension toward the other's ego, no wonder the canvas is inexhaustible! how can anyone exhaust a blank canvas?! only a psychologist can... but no psychologist is actually confined by being sublimely correct... god has become exhausted by the distancing in averting a connection between the study of soul, and the existence of god... psychology is the labour of carrying of stones, with the stones resembling the multiplication of ego that resembles anything morphing into the transcending aspect of breath, i.e. soul; i.e. thought detached from body attached to the "body" of god.*

wait a minute,
so you're telling me that i grew
a beard
to prove is disprove that
i was either more or less,
violent?!
     can't i simply reply:
it gets chilly at the end of
December and early January?
no, really, my face gets cold,
i feel an army of imaginary
***** pinching at my ****** tissue
and i'm trying to prevent them
from doing do...
       so a clean shave = excess of
aggression?
   no one is actually a boxing fan among
the autistic crowd-surfers...
sorry sorry for ramping up
the ****** status,
but there's one thing
     protecting the weak,
and another treating them as propaganda
shields like the Israelis already know
the Palestinians are doing,
don't throw a ****** in my way,
throw yourself
let me see how much ***** you have!
so that i might at least count
up to 2, perhaps 1, or... none!
           i didn't grow a beard to "appear"
more aggressive,
i grew mine because it was getting colder...
*******-dim-whit "scientists"...
            it's cold, i don a beard,
i'm not looking for forking a ****,
dimwits...
            science... ooh look at me i'm
Spartacus!
                  suddenly you're *******
Einstein having revealed to the people
your glorious revelation?!
          i bet you are...
                    science...
almost as bad as religion,
but only half as bad in acting out
a religious practice;
which makes science quasi-religious
in attempting to give an answer...
                  where religion had doubt
that morphed into faith,
science has denial,
that cannot really morph into popular
talk beyond falsehood versus truth...
religion has no asset of denial,
only an assertion of  doubt...
       the scientific
deniability of doubt
                       is in no way,
shape or form,
               a currency to establish
a resurgence of religion with
a doubting of denial...
             since denial is a certainity
while doubt an uncertainty...
          we've reached a point of simlipcirty
that's accustomed to treating
language with a focus of
1 + 1 = 2, as Kant would have put it...
the lesser idiot, and certainly
half the madman...
                             no one best embodies
the madman than the actor
in the role of idiot... and Kant was one...
or so: post-mortem thought
to be...
                 much harder to play
Mr. Bean than to play the Black Adder.