'by all means, marry. if you get a good wife, you'll become happy; if you get a bad one, you'll become a philosopher.'
my, what a tender quote... how about we bypass this morality - and speak of the man who took no wife and morphed her into a life abiding, instead took a woman, and morphed an hour of her "pleasure" and bid life: unbounded?
there is no good nor bad is a woman who preoccupies herself in the trade on body - there's no good as there is no bad with a woman: that comes to be made into a wife!
i hardly think it be worth a man's testimony if he should be asked to be good, when what's being asked of him is related to the fathom of being husband, as trades go,
but when a woman cheats on a man who gives his utmost consent to later be robbed of giving consent... is such a woman above the ******* levelling of consensus?
there actually is no question being asked... only an attempt at making pardon... a ***** might call a man good, but then a free woman might call the same man evil... beyond to what beyond is there differential to be cased?
i judge you not before me as i might judge my shadow to be deemed the existent: clingy...
yet still a ***** will call me good, while a ripe woman of standing will call me ill... and is the reason why i call a *****: woman - and the free woman: boy?
a ******* will call me good, a free woman oppressor... why the surprise at my antonym... the free woman, boy, a *******: a night spent among the cherubs and the wine grapes! sleeping the most sullent sleep,
forgetting, immobile, polite... i can only champion the plight of these women... with my own disguise... i die the fate of a good man in the hands of a *******, as i die in the hands of a free woman, a convicted fiend....
i lose no labours in love, as there were any lost loves in the labours enthroned.