while reading existentialists, i wound a little pandora,
or, rather: a little pandora clue:
outside the english version of "inverted commas"
to suggest ambiguity of a word,
or the question of the person
"speaking" - namely
in the chess narrative
or as some would like to have
it extended, into the realm
of puppets...
      well... i've almost reached
the end of ponderings V...
and i'm starting to construct
the narrative like i might construct
the basic chemistry synopsis;
synopsis? an abbreviation,
a short-cut...
       i just end up thinking in terms
i'm more accustomed to:
boxes... cubes... you name it,
but what really stands out is
the foci (of) per se -
i've found that philosophy adores
itself by this quest,
well... it adorns itself in the jewels
of such a quest...
    the focus? well...
  the abstract form of hide & seek,
let's face it, no man
was born an adult, every man still
re-lives the games of children,
but these, become more & more
abstract, year upon year...
philosophy has this predisposition
to meddle with concrete affairs,
by introducing a complexity,
akin to the socratic "method"
of making plumbers "think"!
few are as lucky to make the assertion,
let alone leave a bandaged wound
of disciples furthering the message...
a strange humanitarian ******
ensued, the base vector it would seem...
but philosophy exposed itself,
akin to the genesis "plagiarism":
within the existential output, or rather:
style, primarily the style of punctuation,
given that diacritical marks were
seemingly the ready: "given"...
now you can syllable my aß...
and think why-oh-why i'd think generation
post-millennial as merely generation zzz...
i.e. generation snooze;
     a bunch of boring ****-tards
and string of surd e;
                well, ****, sometimes you just
av' to snore;
but philosophy exposed the pandora -
it hid it in an -
  ad infinitum per se -
          which might as well be kantian for
a noumenon, but with a twist,
    adding the onion, yep, a layering -
    a temporal framework...
time being essential instructor of the unravelling,
well, existentially that's "unravelling"...
since the kantian model posits a spatial
"non-entity" - with a temporal being origination,
bypassing historical orientation...
i have to check with you:
i'm having doubts whether this is completely
wrong, or whether i'm being numbed
by being right...
          flip of a coin, you see...
   gambling with words is much more than
gambling with the already abstract item
of money...
    for pain, or for pleasure, the same item is used...
heidegger gets in the way from looking
at kant... the entity gets in the way of being...
what remains though, intact, is what happened
to philosophy, namely?
forget plato's cave... i'll show you my "cave"...
it's called amazon.com...
      what was shadow, what was form,
what was prior to seeing the truth "unformed"
has become a storage facility,
  whereby the shadows have becomes boxes...
it has become ridiculous to wonder about
forms, it's time to think about the implosion...
again: the ad infinitum per se!
   the per se! i still abhor nietzsche for calling
kant an idiot... i ******* have a grudge against him
for that... yes: i'll use my french, and i'll sieve
this language to no: pardon my...
macron? fry in hell...
     i thought capitalism was about cheap labour?
cheap? you know... i'd love to see english people
on construction sites, but it seems, esp. in london,
the lazy buggers are hard to find, or even
eager to join the 2nd army...
    too iffy... too stuck in their youtube *******
of a work status: employed - by simply
eating a sandwich on youtube,
or commenting on the size of my ****....
  macron: go, just go... stand next to that canadian
***** of a drama teacher ****-boy.
plato is dead, my friend...
what we're dealing with, what existentialism
exposed is a ******* warehouse,
of boxes, the notion of categorising every
per se imaginable; no, it's not exactly christmas,
thanks to heidegger...
      they really could have avoided
boxing ego in "ego" or of in "of" and kept it
sensible, with boxed (questionable / ambiguous)
words as formidable as: metaphysics, science,
ontology... but no, oh no!
     ****'s sake! typical! german! french!
  thank **** the english weren't involved,
and i'm spearheading the 21st century counter
argument.
      ugh... it's one thing that i'm writing this observation,
and another thing that i'm completely ******
doing so:
   if you want a serious opinion,
ask me tomorrow, and i'll tell you...
           what am i going to cook for dinner?