rhetoric conjures up the most ambivalent compound-nouns, e.g.: cultural-relativism... cultural? relavitism? you can't do that? **** yay! i'll butcher someone on a monday, and you end up calling me a boy-scout on a friday... **** yeah! might as well have been a piece of redied kosher meat, no? rhetoric breeds the most obnoxious sets of ideas, fickle scheming bunch of *******... horn-beggars, squatting misers, the lard fudge, the insolent brigadiers... as i said: a stick: has two ends! you hit with one, you get hit by the other! test me, *******, source yourself as media lucky with your soros... go on, i'm waiting to see your paycheck... journalism, is fake throughout, it doesn't mind whether it's coorporate or independent... it's all fake right now... the only true journalism is done by people who recite their own clamour of life's effort, those who summon the angelic-demons who state: don't convene. man was hardly a man when he convened, he simply turned into a monkey... isolated? well... sorta godly, best replenished by isolated examples of exceptional deviance. thing is... i can understand moral-relativism, that abhorrent scale that the greeks scorned... but cultural-relativism? that's a rhetorical ****... it's not even a question, it's not even a term... i could fiddle with a pair of ******* and find more sense... that means jack-**** to me! 50ml of jack daniels means more to me than the term "cultural-relavitism"... manhattan relative to the amazon rainforest, is that a relative worth pile of comparison, or is that, sarcasm? i'm too drunk to make a choice... cultural relativism... ha ha... ha ha! is that: frankenstein = dracula? you know why i understand moral relativism? the concept of ambiguity: the soldier vs. the murderer... isn't that an ambiguity? that's moral relativism for you: i can't tell the two apart... the **** is "cultural relativism"? some sort of bad joke? a dog's **** worth of concern for a missing bark? ****-head *******; die.