look at me... i'm bewildered!
i don't understand
why the plagiarist hegel
over-arches kant...
wasn't kant, in his critique
able to show the thesis / anti-thesis
dynamic?
    am i dreaming?!
wait, wait a minute...
    antinomy of pure reason,
page 123...
antinomy? conflict,
of transcendental ideas...
    and there are three conflicts
(antinomies)...
   what the hell has hegel
got to do with kant?!
   kant invented the thesis-antithesis
dichotomy that's
a noun on par, second,
in the framework of synthesis...
you know...
  i sometimes wish karl marx
read ol' boring kant
than opportunist hegel...
the latter who plagiarised
the former...
              ******... i like that word,
****** reading,
         yep, he's a hard reading,
but marx should have begun
with kant rather than hegel...
to me hegel is a saboteur
of kantian "idealism"...
   and marx his sucessor...
    careful though,
   be careful with regards to how
you orientate yourself
in the german labyrinth,
so that you fear you paving the way
toward the march / german
unity...
              i warn you...
      i think of history,
should marx have read kant
rather than hegel...
   for the notion of the thesis
and the antithesis begins with kant...
and it ends there,
i despise nietzsche for calling
kant an idiot...
             i'm assured
by the idea that: nietzsche wasn't
too quick in the arithmetic of words
styled to kamikaze-style sentences
of quickened approach... and
they cite this saboteur-charlatan
that's hegel according to marx,
that they forgot the genesis in kant...
read! read the text!
              but beware agitating
the wasps' nest in the german labyrinth
of thought...
     these people are really midgets
in terms of thought translated into
a question of the moral ought, i.e.:
making a choice without forgetting
having a thought.