isn't the negation of global warming, a falscination of the principle of causality? what a stupid question... that would be impossible, and no one could be fooled by denying newtonian laws of motion (history is also a motion, akin to heraclitus' river / flux)... n'ah... impossible! no one could actually believe the falsification of the third law... denying that global warming exists outside the realm of causality, or that causality is a farce... n'ah! impossible! difference though: negation with its existential brute force, suggested by the existentialists as leading toward extinction, within the framework of the "i" dodo-project of the illusionary self, "self"; are these the times when the anglophone word is really reduced to competing objective-vs.-subjective attitudes? of "being" conscious? in terms of being, the western world is but "being" conscious: while in fact non-being... stunted... i swear to god... some metrosexual spider, some viral meme has infected and stunted the western minds... i've been living in a groundhog day for the past ten years, and each day, the "smart" peoples are turning into lunatics, walking around with wrong-think lasers, and turning the fetish for zombie movies, with their group-think; sceptic? is that what "philosophers" would call zombies, in serious literature?

would it ever be a justified arrival
to do with theology once and for all?
to say that theology can
have a historogical dimension based
on, say:
*deus ex machina -
      that, which is the past,
which morphs into
               **** ex machina -
               i.e., that, which is the future;
well? apparently not.
            it's one thing to glorify the past:
the whole enlightenment epoch -
but it's one thing to see the "light",
and another thing to grasp it...
seems almost melancholic to take to
citing prometheus:
guy guys! i brought you... fire!
yeah! fire!
         i bring you fire!
       fire!                 oh yeah:
   the latter part of the 20th century was
akin to the renaissance...
                      better die young than
to fade away...
                 renaissance no. 2 -
but the current pandering and brown-nosing
of the original enlightenment?
fizzled out...
                    so there was prometheus
was like: fire! i bring you fire!
  but the people?
                  n'ah... we prefer bear furr,
and camel fat to keep warm...
      it's one thing to see the light,
      yet another to capture it,
and subsequently use it!
                        didn't the 1984
wrong-think, turn into today's group-think?
hardly an individual in china...
   china per se is an individual in its
rigid cohesion...
                   china isn't a society:
                 it's a socio-military complex -
or the classical rephrasing of it,
    in the western word the military-industrial
complex is actually a misnomer...
        with military precision everything has
received a subtitle: made in china...
     me? i wish i were alive in the days when
the arabs run out of oil.