that "science" is now made "political" is only the consequence of its intrinsic, modern - i.e. technological - essence.

heidegger foresaw more
than nietzsche could
have ever wished to inspire.

            and isn't that the case?
  atheism is more political than
       a materialism frothing
    its mouth against any sort of
spirituality, but more to the point:
mysticism, akin to the islamic
   *sufis, the christian gnostics,
and the jewish kabbalists...
    i find the zeitgeist atheism
   absolutely abhorrent...
                and i don't even need
to cite a personal or an impersonal
reason...
           and yes,
      i find the only feminist to
be in world history, as that of
  mary shelley...
      there was a debate in england
as to whether put jane austen
   on the fiver banknote...
        what about mary shelley?!

and yes, i cackle like a magpie,
   rather than laugh...
          i choke on the first H,
          and then compose a breath
upon the second,
   the first H is the creator of vowels,
the second H is the catcher of vowels,
  the congregation allowance...
       but what's the difference between
  ( he-αληθ/φ)            (he-ayin... yang)
ה‎א‎                    . ה‎ע‎
        ח‎ע‎               .     אח                      .
and     (het-ayin)          and (het-alef)?
   the four dimensions of
laughter, that's what...
  in english: laughter is a direct article,
but the reason for laughing?
    it's an indirect article...
        i.e. ha in hebrew = the...
a direct article...
        but the reason for laughing?
it's wholly indirect, as in: a-,
   a-, without a reason, other than
                           a per se
                                    "reason";
**** me the giggles...
      atheism can only come
        as a seriousness
from allowing laughter to
reign over it...
             needing a logical argument
is a bit... yawn... yawn some more...
           yep, a- (and the hyphen)
means without...
   all those atheists championing
    logic, and reason,
to me? they're just amputees,
    limping along to the tune of
  1 + 1 = 2; even kant said so,
at the end of his critique in the chapter
transcendental methodology...
    i have no idea why pop atheists
cite kant as an atheist,
             given the fact that he wasn't;
it's too tiresome,
        even now, given modern atheism,
it would seem less tedious to go
to a church, and inact the catholic rites
of kneeling and what not...
   at least you had a chance to yawn...
atheistic arguments are beyond
ugly... you can't even seem to get a chance
to yawn, so irritating as they are;
going to a catholic school,
i remember getting an hour's worth
of detention, when i internalised
a yawn (i.e. yawning without opening
my mouth) during our father.