and you wonder, why the english, are so reluctant to learn other languages, perhaps becoming bilingual... oh wait... foreigners become more proficient in their native, than they are in their native tongue; lazy, lazy, bunch of *******! and here's why:
"adverts"...
in magazine tongue that's headlines...
for example, in *the sunday times magazine...
an article, headlined with the following:
ρΗγςics (i, c, s)
Mαdε (M, d)
ΣΛςγ
how can you not be infuriated by this
abomination? just to get an "advert" /
a headliner for an article?
how does the headline translate into pure latin?
rηgsics...
made
slsg
the **** does that even mean?
and you have on one side people staring
into a vacuum and shouting down the rabbit hole
what jim morrison sang: the west is the best...
what the **** makes you think you're
the best, when you allow such profanities?
no wonder these people expect everyone
else to speak their language...
they just can't be bothered to learn
a second language, and evolve beyond
the so-called "**** sapiens"... who, as it turns
out... isn't really rational, or sane, for that matter...
and at least embrace the shallows of
a bilingual entity, of a **** schizoi...
oh **** no, this isn't a case for
wishing an orthodox prescription,
that's impossible...
but it's a case of why the english
are so stubborn in learning a foreign tongue...
they have to in corporate greek letters
to make a ****** article: look "pretty";
they're actually so deluded, that they think
they're the original romans... well, they weren't
deluded, say, 100 years ago...
but 100 years later... they are...
just like the original romans were
deluded about being the trojans...
but this siamese interpretation
of the latin & greek alphabet,
in a newspaper magazine...
zeen zeen, i've seen...
can't be considered serious
journalism; they can interview a physicist...
i don't care...
sure, it "looks pretty"...
but by puritan example,
as already mentioned, it just reads:
rηgsics
made
slsg.
i'm not going to chop off the head off the...
ι... oh look, i already have.