and he said: 'may you falter at every turn when you ask to depict in masonry, as a literal fake, a joke'. what did he imply? you just keep looking at "beard" of ancient antiquity... the egyptian "beard" of the pharaoh... just a strap-on form of, what could probably be misrtaken for a *****... and the babylonian? can you really get curly beards, like the hairs on your head? ****** hairs are brutish, sure, they can seem curly at a centimetre's height... but in a beard? you're not going to get curls on it... plus the depiction... the fact that there are three different layers. i''m sure he left the latins be, since they respected an accuracy to the true image represented in idol-form of a statue, and that they treated these idols, simply equivalent to lamp-posts... and yes, some have very large heads (like michelangelo's david) - disproportionate to the body... as to roman emperors in "idol" form.. a large upper body... but very short legs.

just as latin has been dubbed, a dead language,
so too, has the history embedded with
the latin phoneticism (i.e. the alphabet),
thanks to darwinism, we can erase all the history
embedded in these letters,
             and, perhaps return to the sanctity of
phonecian... or even better...
                            hieroglyphics...
                                 to me, nothing memorable is
actually happening these days,
       i know that something is happening,
              but then darwinism comes along and goes
back thousands of years to a "beginning",
that seems contradictory to the joy of watching
the *bali macaques of the uluwatu temple stealing
tourists' possessions (eye glasses, cameras, etc.)
    and holding the tourists' possessions to ransom,
in exchange for food...
            plus i can boil an egg for a runny yoke in 5minutes...
all i'm saying is...    i need the now,
                    the immediacy of sensations!
i'm talking through a microscope of history,
    a day-to-day...
                     these journalists in the papers are talking
through the perspective of a telescope of history...
                    and by journalists, i mean, the proud boys
of england... who are standing on one leg (darwin)
since newton was debunked by einstein;
        please don't mention standing on two legs by citing
shakespeare...           it's a different barrel of herrings.