it's a bit like watching a bunch of retards
trying to say the word: hello.
honestly...
             the **** are you on about?
you serious? you think that by wearing suits
and tying your shoelaces, you
       can argue **** up to, then, legislate
and then feel? when your arguments
are based on the focus of, altruism / autism?
what, a, bunch, of, retards!
    you're trying to legislate "correct" grammar?
what, so english is no longer english
because you think that there's a way of speaking
the language, as being "offensive"?
        let me rephrase it... law is guided by
a thesaurus... being? by a dictionary...
                  if you're going to invent a word...
make sure it's a chemical...
                                  some form of an antibiotic...
what the **** are you retards doing,
mutilating a language to such staged, courtroom
case extremes?
           this isn't a spectacle for law...
          it's a lesson in grammar...
        you're making the basis of legislating a law,
        something out of grammar school observation?
pronoun, correct... what?!
                                                                       huh?!
   the **** is this?
       is this some sort of joke, are these seriously
attired people talking about this *******?
           it's a joke, right?
        these people can't be dressed-up to look so
serious, and then be reduced to talking about,
well... either blah; or nothing.