does the youth of today realise
it doesn't run a monopoly
                           of internet content?
        do they? really?!
          with the context of internet
banking... and online shopping...
can youth of today please *******
with their belitteling chants
  and, please  use the playground?
it's become a bit like giving
    an aged psychopath a red button,
to launch a nuclear weapon...
oh wait: here comes the nation
      getting all paranoid... being the sole
powehouse to have... actually detonated
it on a civilian area!
        yeah... russia is bad... no no tommy,
no no jim...
              they're like germans...
they imploded... and felt guilty...
but instead of producing great machines
of the 4 wheels... they decided upon great
movies... guilt is internalised in many
shapes and sizes...
                  the french were reasonable
though...
      it's a bit like that fire-******* story...
set of a petard in your hand when it's
open... you'll get a scratch...
      but set off the fire-******* (petard)
        while your hand is clenched...
     boom! try waving after that...
                      the french were reasonable
in that they did their nuclear tests
        in aquatic environments...
        natural insulators...
                      that's actually not reasonable
in the puritan sense of the words...
      where was the japanese army bombing
the **** out of the tsunami wave of
                                         2011 tōhoku?
i swear the army could have intervened...
bombed the **** out of the massive wave
                                  and stopping it by dividing it...
where was the *** army?
      oh right... nowhere... there was a helicopter with
a reporter going: oh ha! nagasaki!
                               kimono sa ka!
              i swear... if they bombed the **** out of
that wave, it wouldn't have travelled inland and
ever had done the damage... that it had done...
        so much for the army... and so much
for the *** emperor...
                 eh?
               you bomb the tsunami wave...
the wave doesn't travel inland...
             1 + 1 = 2?
              really? was that the time to consider
   the question as a rhetorical ambiguity?
by the way? there's no such thing as a rhetorical question...
not in the way the phrase is dropped...
       you really can't ask a "rhetorical question"
if you're rhetorically sound, i.e. readied to
blah blah for the next half hour...
                              who asks a rhetorical question
is not someone already performing the sophist art
of performance speech that goes: on and on, on and on...
  if someone says: that was a rhetorical question...
it's just covert tactic for them to keep on talking...
     what the **** is a rhetorical question?
answer? the person asking that question,
            keeping up with their monologue.
                    a rhetorical question doesn't endorse
a dialogue... a rhetorical question, as a phrase
             is a solipsistic / sophist tactic: the two
ought to be synonymous...
             for the person talking... to just keep on talking
(you can do that pigeon neck movement
          speaking the italics... yeah... like you're
head-banging).