apparently nothing is impossible these days... if nebuchadnezzar were to be alive, and open the newspaper (the times) on this day, march the 21st 2017, and turned to page 4, he would have seen his dream realised, he'd have cried, seeing the hanging garden of Cotehele, on the banks of Tamar in Cornwall
no one really notices it, but they state it quiet
blatantly...
this isn't the case to remember
the *scopes' trial / monkey trial...
the original beauty of the theory has been
hijacked with ideological motifs...
on that ground, i can't accept it
any more, not as a former student of chemistry;
it has simply exhausted itself
and yes, the transition from monkey
to man is dead... what i call the resuscitation
of god...
and even i find abhorrent the two primes
in terms of idea from the christian doctrine:
forgiving one's enemies (it's hardly
a forgiveness, but more or less
a machiavellian tactic for scheming)...
but too true the chant: mea culpa.
to take responsibility for one's own actions
is the sensible prime... but it really depends
on how you deal with it.
- i mention cultural darwinism for a reason,
biology is truly pointless if the orthodoxy of
medicine isn't stated first...
cultural darwinism doesn't originate
in medicine, it's not there... biology has become
too humanistic, in the sense that economists
don't address the objective arguments
but rather stress a subjectivity...
to me, economy is a humanism, it's not a science...
if it was a science, it would embody the rigour
of science... but it doesn't... it feeds off emotional
content... the adrenaline junkies of wall st.?
they're there, and they will always be there...
it's that the popularisation of darwinism has created
a polar-opposite reaction...
i'm just tired of hearing all these
evolutionary vocab., it bores me...
i could say that it frightens me,
but what it really does... is what the quran does
to jews... it breeds infantilism:
at least cultural marxism exposes what
capitalism has become, akin to soviet architecture
in terms of cultural productivity and output...
it's ******* ugly these days... repetitive...
a thorn in my backside...
cultural darwinism = infantilism...
i can't reach back to a history that i am
allowed to reach back into...
for example: the emotional exaltations of
the deutschordensstaat... the monkish order
of the teutonic order of knights (baltic state)...
cultural darwinism will state that i'm being
a child... that i have no serious point to make...
but then: when was the last time you heard anyone
speak about the sexuality of clemency?
how you can internalise ****** energy
and self-propagate to a pleasurable state of being
using the genitals, and not thinking of anything
pleasurable?
when was the last time you heard that?
music? highly regarded in my concerns,
i'd say the most necessary entity...
but cultural darwinism doesn't allow people
to reach for the past to represent the future
and in doing what requires to be done now...
i inherited the practices of the teutonic order...
i've never been to malbork castle...
but i look at it as: well... the polish-lithuanian
commonwealth didn't destroy it, but kept it,
which means i respect the culture inherent in it,
i can appropriate it... ordensburg marienburg:
unlike what the germans did
to warsaw in 1944... i.e. completely
destroyed it...
and so jagiełło... with two naked swords...
but of course, the argument is stated again:
i'm being "infantile"...
a child reading into history and extracting
an identity for myself that is not applicable to
the "modern" world...
but in a hundred years: future generations
will state the same as we have passed
judgement on preceding generations:
barbarians... stupids...
i can already say the current
zeitgeist is idiotic; how about that, hmm?
i don't understand why cultural darwinism
wasn't spotted in the west, given that
marxism devolved from an economic model
into a cultural model... and even if the architecture
of the west is superior to the yore architecture of communism...
the cultural output of western society has come
to represent the architecture of communism...
fact being: there was no time to build fancy places
of accommodation after the second world war in the east...
fast fast... cascade cascade... efficiency!
quick! before the next genghis khan
arrives!
but cultural darwinism is as real
as cultural marxism...
what counters the argument
is the difference between hogs and boars...
boars in the east didn't receive a marshall plan
strategy... but the hogs in the west did...
again and again and again: sveeden was neutral
in the war... but it still received bribes after
the war ended... or is that shveeden?
so much of the narrative i'm
providing has no voice in the anglophone world
that it almost deserves me giving it one...
at least for the "horde" of slavs that
became anglo-slavs to have something to balance on,
in the future.